X
- 1957
- TV-PG
- United Artists
- 1 h 36 m
- 1957
- TV-PG
- United Artists
- 1 h 36 m
Summary 12 Angry Men, by Sidney Lumet, is a behind-closed-doors look at the American legal system. This iconic adaptation of Reginald Rose’s teleplay stars Henry Fonda as the dissenting member on a jury of white men ready to pass judgment on a Puerto Rican teenager charged with murdering his father. The result is a saga of epic proportions that ...
Directed By: Sidney Lumet
Written By: Reginald Rose
- 1957
- TV-PG
- United Artists
- 1 h 36 m
- 1957
- TV-PG
- United Artists
- 1 h 36 m
12 Angry Men
9.2
Where to Watch
Coming Soon
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Summary 12 Angry Men, by Sidney Lumet, is a behind-closed-doors look at the American legal system. This iconic adaptation of Reginald Rose’s teleplay stars Henry Fonda as the dissenting member on a jury of white men ready to pass judgment on a Puerto Rican teenager charged with murdering his father. The result is a saga of epic proportions that ...
Directed By: Sidney Lumet
Written By: Reginald Rose
Where to Watch
Coming Soon
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Top Cast
Metascore
Universal Acclaim Based on 18 Critic Reviews
97
100% Positive
18 Reviews
18 Reviews
0% Mixed
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Metascore
Universal Acclaim Based on 18 Critic Reviews
97
100% Positive
18 Reviews
18 Reviews
0% Mixed
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Former TV director Sidney Lumet's solid success is achieved without even once resorting to flashbacks or other standard procedures of the film trade. The secret rests in spirited dialogue, realistic setting and, of course, the excellent cast of outstanding character actors that make up the jury. [21 Apr 1957, p.106]
By Edward Kosmal
Henry Fonda, Martin Balsam, John Fiedler, and Jack Warden lead a cast that glues you to the screen and never lets you go till the final verdict.
By Shane Romanchick FULL REVIEW
User Score
Universal Acclaim Based on 825 User Ratings
9.2
97% Positive
800 Ratings
800 Ratings
2% Mixed
14 Ratings
14 Ratings
1% Negative
11 Ratings
11 Ratings
User Score
Universal Acclaim Based on 825 User Ratings
9.2
97% Positive
800 Ratings
800 Ratings
2% Mixed
14 Ratings
14 Ratings
1% Negative
11 Ratings
11 Ratings
Dec 5, 2025
A timeless classic of tension and debate Few films manage to stay as gripping and relevant after so many decades, and 12 Angry Men is one of the rare examples where time only strengthens its effect. The cinematography guides the tension with such precision that the film still feels fresh, and the black and white visuals together with the surprisingly clean sound create an atmosphere that would be difficult to reproduce with modern techniques unless the entire script were rebuilt from the ground up. The confined setting becomes a strength because the play-like structure turns the jury room into a concentrated stage on which every shift in tone or argument lands with full weight, and this also helps the film maintain a natural flow even when the characters become louder or more confrontational The cast gives the film its true power because every juror has a clear personality that emerges through gesture, voice, frustration or stubbornness, which allows the dynamics within the room to build gradually instead of feeling like isolated moments. Even the more exaggerated reactions work within the theatrical framing of the story, especially since the era of production made this kind of intensity a natural stylistic choice. The recurring use of weather supports this emotional progression as well because the heavy heat mirrors the pressure rising inside the room, and the arrival of rain marks a clear emotional turning point that settles the shifting balance among the jurors. Despite some elements that feel slightly heightened, the storytelling stays focused and sharp from beginning to end. The conflicts evolve with a rhythm that never loses momentum, and the film ultimately succeeds because the questions it raises remain painfully relevant. The way it exposes biases, social pressure and the fragility of justice still resonates today, which is why the film continues to feel essential rather than historical.
Report
Too few films take on the art of arguing as a subject; we could certainly use more of them, but until then, Lumet’s window into strained civic duty will continue to serve mightily.
A penetrating, sensitive, and sometimes shocking dissection of the hearts and minds of men who obviously are something less than gods. It makes for taut, absorbing, and compelling drama that reaches far beyond the close confines of its jury room setting.
By A.H. Weller FULL REVIEW
Though the jury in 12 Angry Men reaches a verdict, neither Rose nor Lumet definitively state whether they're "right." The point—as Lumet well knows—is that when it comes to making sense of a picture, a lot depends on the framing.
Perhaps the motivations of each juror are introduced too quickly and are repeated too often before each changes his vote. However, the film leaves a tremendous impact.
By Staff (Not Credited) FULL REVIEW
Mechanically written, but within its own middlebrow limitations, it delivers the goods.
Apr 10, 2025
Well written masterpiece with grounded twists & power of Doubt & Persuasion! 12 Angry Men is a classic cinema that surprises you with this amazing play incased around a jury following a murder case. Almost 99 percent of the movie takes place in a single room with 12 jurors whose names aren’t shared with the audience and eachother and are only give numbers. The film has this amazing way to tell us about each of the juror as the movie goes on without pushing too much. The writing is just immaculate and the cinematography is honestly one of the best even comparing to modern cinema. The single shots and framing is just beautiful. The hidden details are all there for anyone to see and I’m sure upon a rewatch I will discover more. The twists are very grounded and are not waiting or pushing the viewer to be blown by it. It comes naturally to **** has a lot of secret messages and hidden topics to uncover. The ones I understood were Power of Persuasion, the un-denying conviction of Doubt and how subjective our decisions are based on our own **** in all, a masterpiece of cinema that will forever stay with me and has made it’s way to my top 10 movies of all time! PROS:
- Beautiful writing and cinematography.
- Good character balance between showing white privilege and racism against immigrants.
- Topics that not shown much in movies today. CONS:
- Honestly none. I thought it would be a drag and slow paced movie being from 1957 but it blew me away!
Report
Sep 19, 2023
I didn't like the film very much, the characters constantly change their decision because of the opinion of others, they don't find a common agreement, it's an endless debate, we don't know if the accused is guilty or not. On the other hand, the fact that the characters are on the limit of being static makes the film long, there is no real action, the scene takes place throughout a room. This certainly leads us to think about the ways of thinking and the impact it generates on someone else's opinion but it is not really fair in the end.
Report
Apr 20, 2022
Pour un film de Sidney Lumet, c’est étonnamment regardable. Il faut dire que le réalisateur de somnifères s’est limité à une heure et demi, ce qui est déjà conséquent pour un tel huis-clos procédurier. Ici, on ne suit pas le procès mais on refait le procès en coulisses et on s’engueule… et surtout on assiste à un numéro de manipulation magistral ! Pensez donc, un homme seul retourne les 11 autres comme des crèpes ! au nom bien sûr de la lutte (finale) contre l’affreuse peine capitale et parce que cet homme seul est un bisounours à faire mourir de honte Jésus et potentiellement un communiste refoulé : on ne voit pas d’autre explication. Car les faits sont tout de même patents et ressassés, puis balayés au fur et à mesure par des interprétations sujettes à caution et particulièrement discutables. Il aurait fallu une affaire bien plus ambigüe pour rétablir la balance et partant, le doute. Ici, on a l’impression fort désagréable de s’être fait manipuler pendant une heure et demi : tout était écrit d’avance et les faits s’y sont pliés bien gentiment, ne nous laissant qu’une illusion de rebondissements qui n’en sont pas. Non, on avale pas de telles couleuvres : récusez ce film en définitive bien merdique qui se fout de notre gueule !
Report
Awards
Golden Globes, USA
• 4 Nominations
Academy Awards, USA
• 3 Nominations
Berlin International Film Festival
• 2 Wins & 2 Nominations
