Fallout 4

Eu amei foi uma experiência entanto, a Bethesda caprichou nesse jogo. Estou aguardando Fallout 5, espero que The Elder Scrolls VI seja igual.

This is a good action-adventure game with RPG elements in a sandbox world. With that being said, I think Bethesda needs to understand why fans love the previous two entries (Fallout 3 and New Vegas) so much and why people did not like Starfield as much as they would've hoped. For an action-adventure game, the story and gameplay is good but it's nothing special - its missing too many of the RPG elements that made 3 and New Vegas resonate with many players and fans alike.

seriously the game is not that bad like people say the game is realtively good wth some issues since bethesda love recycling their old game engine but at least it's a graphically and physically acceptable compared to that piece of **** called new vegas that people liked for no particular reason it just came out in the right time the game is graphycally worst than it's older brother and with the speciall bethesda **** engine the game physically feels like a rotten vegetable you can like it if you want but dont lie to yourself

mods carry the game and the world feals dead and dosnt really react to a large portion of your actions

Fallout 4 is not a good game, not because of the changes it made to the Fallout formula up to this point, but because of an inability to make their new systems fun and refreshing while still holding on to the past. Fallout 4 has such an interesting world and buildup that it intrigues you to go out and explore to save your child, but this beautiful world you're given is so devoid of actual content. Fallout 4 decides to take a more action-oriented approach on the formula, but it still decides to keep a lot of RPG elements of its predecessors, making things like S.P.E.C.I.A.L system not as involved as it was before. Couple that with terribly designed UI and UX systems for things like criticals or inventory management and an over-tutorialization of its most basic mechanics from characters that would've had depth from any other Fallout game, and this makes for a very frustrating experience. But at its core, Fallout 4 is really bad at meshing its action with its worldbuilding. Exploration is a chore in Fallout 4 because the game does not know how to adequately reward players for their pattern recognition and curiosity. Interesting landmarks pose challenges that are easily navigable by equipment the game gives you in excess and are often so full of enemies with such little reward waiting at the end of them. And characters and side quests are so boring. The writing is unnatural, and the dialogue choices you get in this game don't let you reveal as much about the world as in previous games. I thought Fallout was the game series that made you contemplate the relationships between the humans and the environment in a challenging geopolitical climate, not a Yes/No simulator. Speaking of which, when dealing with social issues, I believe games should let the player decide for themselves how to approach them, but Fallout 4 gave our main characters voice acting, so none of our choices truly feel like our own. It takes the illusion of vastness and complexity that previous Fallout games were so elegantly able to manage, and reveals the entire magic trick, making the game less immersive and less meaningful. The game fails to make use of its interesting setup, and delivers a game that lacks incentive, atmosphere, and challenge at the expense of more enemies and gunplay. And that's all assuming the game runs as intended, because Bethesda will Bethesda. This game was clearly too ambitious for its own good, because it truly had the foundation of something pretty special, but it was executed relatively poorly.