gennaroRonnega

Not sure why this game has better score than incredible games, such as the last of us, red dead redemption, to talk of some games of the same generation. Maybe is because it was out earlier in the ps3 life cycle. This game is not a classic at all, insignificant story, gameplay did not improve much on the first game and that's just a mediocre shooter game. questionable level design. That's an ok game that should have been rated 7 top. Really made an effort to play it till the end, and it was not worth it.

One of the best adventure games I have ever played. You solve a mistery in an abandoned train station, hotel and sorroundings. It's creepy but not scary. Very good narrative, a lot of charachters you have to find out about. You explore, find clues of what happened, solve puzzles, a little detective mistery story.

that's good myst like point and click first person adventure game. Amazing story, good graphics. decent puzzles. the only problem seems the navigation gameplay often confusing.

Great game, huge and amazing story. A leap forward in gameplay and scenario on it's predecessor, a good replica of GTA: san andreas. The map is very large and feels well edited. The story is the real aim of the single player experience, and a lot on effort was put to the online playing. My only disappoint on this series at this point is that even if I enjoy the sandbox world and fooling around a little bit, I would like a deeper connection and control over the criminal carreer of the characters. I would like to manage car theft, drug dealing, robbery, etc. as activities that build up when you buy certain properties, and when they are set they should grant you money over time. You should start from nothing, and become the real Boss of the city.

I have to say I didn't finish the game since english is not my mother thounge so I fond it very hard to understand the main feature of the game, the case narration and investigation through lines of dialogues. I think this game could have been much better if localized and without the action parts that are poorly developed. The game is different from any other, so I have to give rockstar credit for the bravery, and I really appreciate what is good in the game, but there are things that didn't work. At the end this game is a crossover of a detective graphic adventure, wich is ok, and a gta sandbox, like it was made not from rockstar. I would have given 6 if i ended the game, but since i didn't care to. It's 5

Not all potential of the game ideas came out of this title. I think they went a little too far with the ambition and then realized half of it due to low budget or too much time in development. It has some surprising ideas and some good quest system. But after all it is just a scripted and one way fps and not a real rpg. The driving part seems taken by a bad videogame and very basic. The world don't come to life like it should and the story is not anything special. The fps gameplay is actually good even if the weapons an ammo are limited. Still good to have secondary weapon. No relevant multiplayer.

This is a good game in 2017... never played a battlefield game before only killzone2, rage and cod mw3. I have to say the single player experience is acceptable, the story and cutscenes are lame but the gameplay is fun and with enough variety. In the multiplayer experience it gives it's best and becomes fairly hard for me. The conquest mode is strange for me as i didn't get it's mechanics and a game seem to last waaay too long. I still remember the first far cry multiplayer as more fun. But this game makes things work for a more updated gameplay. It's mostly cahotic and fast paced, and I think that's good for this kind of game.

that's a good old school point and click adventure with retro graphics. I only played the first episode and I must say the story is interesting at first, but I don't know if I like where it's going. I don't know if it's me or it is just that these kind of gaming is much better than the recent adventures, I played the first episode of "The wolf among us" ad I found it not being fun as these kind of games. I must say I didn't understand the "notes" mechanics at first, when you have to compare the clues, and the inventory is useless. The game is more about talking to poeple than actually solving problems. The programming is good but not faultless, and the gameplay and the menus are also too retro. but the dialogues are actually with audio. It's a little short but you don't feel like it has a story that's being artificially made longer than it should be. Suggested to old school point and click fans. Even though seven days a skeptic was far more interesting

the game is good, it looks good, the gameplay is ok and modernize the genre, it's narrative works fine and the characters have the same witty characteristic of the old games. I enjoyed playing it and consider other chapters. What does not work to me is that it's gameplay is not the same as the old games, by introducing ability check with quicktime events it is no more a game suitable for every gamer. My parents loved the old games but could not play the quicktime event parts so it became a title suitable for young audience, no more to anyone. And that's sad to me. I would have preferred a real old school point and click adventure suitable for all ages. Plus you still have tedious walk from one part to another wirh nothing to do and that's still 99 percent of gameplay time. THe puzzle parts are welcome. The quicktime event ruins the mood, such as the shooting bits

the original had better puzzles in my opinion, this sequel manage to expand the gameplay with slightly different game mechanics, but still i want to replay the first one more than the second one.

they managed to pack some sort of narrative in a 3D puzzle game with original puzzles mechanics. nearly perfect game that you wish to replay, it can't get old.

That's a good game from the creators of the best selling sandbox games that there are on the market. It was actually too long to finish the main quest and I got a little bored in the middle since all you do is shooting people down, killing thousands in an already desert land, it's quite strange there was still people living in the map since I felt I committed a genocide without encountering much problems with the authorities, that wanted to shoot me down for stealing a horse but was not impressed by my exterminator skills. The most important part of the game is the map, which is pretty large and is beautiful to live in, with many animals to shoot, horses to tame, and is fun also to just explore. I think the creators wanted the narrative part to be equally important, but to me it was less interesting and too much wishy-washy in an everlasting main quest, and not so interesting secondary quest. what i wanted in the game was actual interactivity, building a ranch piece by piece, making little money, buying animals to breed in the ranch, buying properties not only to sleep in it or to save the game. hiring people to work with you, that would have made a much more immersive experience and would have extended the longevity over the main quest at the end of which, I quitted the game.

that is a game whose mechanics are not to shoot everyone down. It's more a graphical experience than an actual game since the gameplay is not very sophisticated but very basic. It is a 3d platform with original mechanics, but the gameplay is not so fun as other platform games. It's good looking, magical, imaginative a little cryptic experience. very short, but with this gameplay you could not play it for hours, so it's just right in my opinion. maybe it should be a little more fun to play, it should be more interesting exploring such beautiful places, a little more sophisticated gameplay and eventually a little longer.