WCM320

Such a great odd game... I would give it higher then an 8, but this is a game that is going to be stuck in "Pre alpha" forever.

Just totally uninspired. Blizzard simple does not know what they are doing anymore.

I know a lot of people liked this, but i just could not bring myself to care at all... Blizzard really needs to learn to leave there storylines alone.

This game was such a mess... Such a wonderful mess, classic which is not even really this game, is still better in many ways then current retail wow. but also they have clearly learned stuff from making the game this long. I feel like you could make a perfect MMO at this point by remaking vanilla wow.

You know I like this Expac more then most but even I don't really care. It really does go to show that blizzard just does not know how to leave there story alone and in a good place ever.

The first real MAJOR mistep of the game... Becuase simply put, who cares? I don't know a single person who are invested in this story.

The first major misstep for WOW. And the thing is the expansion was not that bad, it was more a matter of the lasting effect on the game, if they had know ahead of time what they where doing they might have been able to save this a lot more by using the phasing mechanic, so you didn't change the lower level parts of the game.

Really I don't know that a MMO is ever going to beat this on an expansion by expansion basis for me. Everquest ruine of kunark might be the closest thing to it I can think of.

Really the last Amazing expansion they did. And it really shows that this was when they ran out of original content from the Strat games.

I really don't know what people giving this a low score want. its a great game, it a perfect port, there is really no down side to this game.

One of the two best games of its kind really ever made. It's kind of the perfect answer to the simplicity of Disgaea 1.

Its one of the best games ever made, i just give it a 9/10 because it really is just a lazy rerelease and should not have been near full price.

It's fine for a MMO. It really did kind of leave out the best part about the prior FFMMO.

I give this a 7/10 because its a good total war game, people who are giving it low marks for (Insert reason) Kind of seam to forget that no one else has done it better in this genre so far.

It's a fantastic game, but its also a game were your either goingt o like it or your not.

A game so good I feel like the 581 people who gave it a negative score should be found and given help. And the people who gave it mixed should be given a hug...

Honestly, one of the most clever games ever made. It's a shame about KSP2.

Stellaris is a great example of players not knowing what they want. The 8 it has is fair, but it should be a bit higher, there is nothing better then it right now and most likely wont be fore awhile. The only real issue with it is that it feels very much like a "Live service" With the company constantly tinkering with it.

I give this game a 10 based on the game as it came out, not what it is today. To be totally honest EQ would most likely make a better single-player game at this point than most modern games. I would really love a modern take on this game style, but I don't know that it would work as an MMO at this point. I can however still 22 years later still sit down and play this game with friends or by myself and it holds up, I know people who where not born when this game came out who have played it and are blow away. I don't know that there will be another EQ until game technology really has a major change.

For what this game is, it's more or less the best you get right now. It has problems but I feel like any game of this kind is going to .

For what this game is, its' about as good as you can ask for. Most of the issues are more with the company and less the game.

War thunder is very much a matter of "It's not perfect but its the best in class" The only other game of it's kind that I really worthy playing right now is World of Warships. And these two games are different enough that they don't overlap.

I constantly make the argument that 10's and 0's should be saved for special games. I am sort of breaking that rule at the moment, I think this game is a solid 8. Maybe a 9. But the fact of the matter is that I can't really think of a 10 in this brand of game. Most people I see giving it lower scores cry about NV or 3. (Both great games) But then their arguments fall apart, NV and 3 have issues, ALL open-world games have issues. FO4 on the other hand.. It's gunplay is some of the best I can find, even is full out FPS's. The leveling is different but good. The settlement building is good. The STORYLINE IS GOOD! People who say it is not don't know what storyline is, they confused story and writing, because Yes the Writting is kind of lackluster... The Storyline in NV was garbage but had fantastic writing. FO4 is a solid 8 maybe 9, but nothing I have put this must time into can't get a 1 point bump out of me.

Honestly one of the best games ever made, and a great addition to the original.

This is yet another game where if I see someone give it a 10 or a 0 I just assume they're stupid or arguing in bad faith. The 6.2 that its currently at I feel is fair if not a bit harsh. If you want a star trek game online, this is it, and most likely there is not going to be a better attempt in quite some time. The combat (Both ship and ground) Is good, I have friends who don't even like/know anything about star trek who has played who like the combat well enough, it's not great but its not bad. The real issue with the game is just that **** not very star trek overall...

This is another great example of me not knowing what people want? People giving this a 5/10 clearly have no idea what they want. it's a great improvement over the prior game. It's not perfect but for the serious I don't really know what people are griping about.

It's fine. it's always been fine, it's gotten better also. Yes it has a lot of issues. Yes its not a normal Fallout game. The company was however always honest about what kind of gam it was (Yes Bethesda should be shouted out over the luancher/bag) But a lot of people clearing are just mad that it's not what they want, instead of not what it said it would be. All that being said, 5/10....

The best part about this game? All the Russian bots giving it 10/10's on there reviews. This game would be alright if it came out in 2010. But it's the pretty bottom of the pile for a 2020 release.

the 8.3 it has is to low, which makes sense almost everyone giving it a 0 to review bomb it is crying about something that does not pertain to the game itself.

The problem with the game is that on the surface everything looks... OK. But just okay. Once you get into it, however, everything is just bad or at the very least meh. It's not really an RPG because nothing you do matters. It's not really a Stealth game because the stealth is so bad. The models would look good if this was a 2012 game. WIth the Werewolves being pretty good if not a little dated, but the humans being just bad. The combat is in and of its self not terrible but the controls are some o the least intuitive I've seen. A lot of people are saying that you should not compare this to a AAA game, but to be fair I don't compare anything to AAA games, not even most AAA games anymore. Even when considered as a "Small indie game" Which this is not, Cyanide is a professional game company after all. It's just not every good, it's not the worse thing I have seen, it just not good. The soundtrack is easily the best thing about the game...

Conan exiles is a great example of most players having no idea what they want. This is honestly the best anyone could ask for in a Conan game. And it better then most the games its in the game genra of. It's basically a better balanced Arc.

EQ2 is a great example of trying to take something unique and make it like everything else. it's fine, it was fine when it came out, and its fine now. But there is nothing special about it.

I feel like the 7.3 score it has is pretty fair. EVE Is interesting because there is nothing else like it, and most likely won't be again for a very long time. Most of the issue with the game is just on the business side of things. It really should not be subscription-based at this point. It's not worth that much to be honest.

The game is fine.. If you can run it. I have had no problems running it but I have friends who have. As for the game play itself? The controls are great the combat is great the characters and leveling system are great. The problem is that this does not strike me as a "I'm going to put 300+ hours into" It game if that's what you want. Then no superhero game like this is going to work for you. most of the people giving it 0/10 I have seen there arguments make no sense. Were peoples arguments DO make sense is that this should not be a full priced game, and there should be less microtransactions, but I can ignore those for the most part. People, who argue the character all play the same? I assume they didn't play the game. And people crying about Ms Marvel being in the game? IDK pick up a comic? Maybe dive into Marvel slightly deeper than the MCU?

As it is right now? This game is a 5 out of 10. In 6-12 months after it has been largely fixed on a technical level? It will likely be a 7-8 out of 10. It will be either a solid game in the like of GTA5 or Fallout4. Or if they just fix the technical bugs it will be worse than both. A 6-7 out of 10. Almost everything we were told about the game is not cut content, the AI is terrible. Driving is terrible. The world doesn't make sense in a lot of areas. The AI for driving literally does not exist. The world is not "Vertical" This honestly a version of GTA that looks like it came out the year after GTA. Only slightly better and that is before we get to the bugs. Because this is without a drought the buggiest game I have ever seen... ON LAUNCH DAY. Buggier than FO4. GTA5. RDR2. TW3. And that is before we get to the discussion of consoles or poor faith from the company. This has basically wipped out all of the good faith that most people had with CDPJR. Wich as far as I'm concerned is fine. There games are fine, but the hype around them was always misplaced.

If you have a PS4 or XBox One. Don't get the game... Ever. It's not going to get fixed, it should have never been put out on these consoules.

If you have to play the game on one of the two base consoles. Never buy it, they are not going to fix it. It should have never been put on these consoles.

I'm actually rather disappointed that I have to give this game a 5 out of 10. It should be noted that I'm not the kind of person who likes to or tends to overhype Games. But this was disappointing even from the perspective of what I was expecting. The game was Overhyped and that's not its fault, people really nostalgia goggle New Vegas hard so this game was always going to have that issue. But the game itself has. Boring gameplay, this is a FPS with more or less the same system as New Vegas which was a poor FPS system then and its a worse one now, the AI is also basically useless. The game world is interesting but shallow, with about 20 hours of gameplay if you go to everything. And it's pretty technically bad, if this was a small indy studio I would be nicer to it. But its not. People keep forgetting that Obsidion is a mid sized professional game studio.