SummaryA phony psychic/con artist and her taxi driver/private investigator boyfriend encounter a pair of serial kidnappers while trailing a missing heir in California.
Directed By:Alfred Hitchcock
Written By:Ernest Lehman, Victor Canning
Family Plot
Metascore
Generally Favorable
79
User score
Generally Favorable
7.6
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Top Cast
Metascore
Generally Favorable
88% Positive
7 Reviews
7 Reviews
13% Mixed
1 Review
1 Review
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
100
Beneath all the fun, there's a vision of humans as essentially greedy and dishonest, presented with a gorgeously amoral wink from Hitchcock, and performed to perfection by an excellent cast.
100
The performances are first-rate (finally free of the casting constraints, Hitchcock displayed--in 1972's Frenzy as well--a deliciously offbeat taste in performers) and the screenplay by Ernest Lehman (North By Northwest) is a witty model of construction. The humor is more obvious and subversive than any of Hitchcock's films since The Trouble With Harry.
User score
Generally Favorable
80% Positive
16 Ratings
16 Ratings
20% Mixed
4 Ratings
4 Ratings
0% Negative
0 Ratings
0 Ratings
Oct 6, 2020
10
Maybe if this one it's not the best Hitchcock movie, it has certain elements that are quite entertaining and "****"
Jul 10, 2022
8
An average plot elevated by superb direction. The talented cast and compelling screenplay breath life into each character. The pacing and editing are a masterclass in storytelling. The two hour runtime breezes past.
90
Family Plot is a dazzling achievement for Alfred Hitchcock masterfully controlling shifts from comedy to drama thoughout a highly complex plot. Witty screenplay, transplanting Victor Canning's British novel, The Rainbird Pattern, to a California setting, is a model of construction, and the cast is uniformly superb.
80
Because there is no point in worrying over hapless victims, the audience can devote its energies to trying to guess how the master will stage his next sneak attack. It's futile. At 76, Hitchcock is still one jump ahead. [05 Apr 1976, p.85]
75
Everything's laid out for us and made clear, we understand the situation we can see where events are leading... and then, in the last 30 minutes, he springs one concealed trap after another, allowing his story to fold in upon itself, to twist and turn, and scare and amuse us with its clockwork irony.
70
A witty, relaxed lark. It's a movie to raise your spirits even as it dabbles in phony ones.
58
It’s enjoyable enough, and the acting is comparatively looser than most of what comes before it thanks to the allowed improvisations on set, a first for the director
Jul 8, 2024
7
Alot better than I thought it would be, Clever script, lots of double entendres, But there's a few goofy characters who are sometimes annoying, the production looks cheap , with dated 70's fashions and sensibilities, A far cry from the usual Hitchcock elegant productions
