10,000 BC

I liked it. The action was immense and it had a likeable theme to it. The plot was not the most complex and it wasn't very original in terms of scope. However the acting was great and i like the characters. he ending ruined it, however

I like historail **** thus one is ordinaryl.I like historail **** thus one is ordinaryl.

this film is not as bad as everyone is saying, not by far one of the best but it is worth at least one watch. the plot is not very good but when you get to the action bits they do a good job, give this film a chance

What a dissapointment this movie looked like it could have been an interesting prehistoric adventure film since it hasprehistoric creatures in it but it fails wit poor script, mediocre acting, and an inconsistent tone along with a lackluster villain, there are some elements that can be interesting but don’t work due to poor excecution and I heard a lot of terrible things of this movie because I always expect emmerich to make a great blockbuster epic with likeable charachters an involving narrative with drama and tension and most of all exciting action he was capable of making an intelligent serious history film with the patriot and anonymous ( which was his third a attempt ) but his second falls flat hard to imagine how much negative were critics on this film but I can’t give it a complete zero only because of the potential it has as well as it’s CGI and visuals this film is also inaccurate in its portrayal of prehistory did mammoths or even tigers with saber teeth exist in the bc year of 10,000 and why do the caveman speak English which they didn’t since back then they did either sign language or spoke the language of apes perhaps one of the ways they could have made this great is they could have just made this into a foreign language film with completely non English language and that there would be subtitles when they speak primate language. and while I can’t say this is not as bad as the uwe boll lord of the rings knock off ( which came out the same year as this wasted potential ( 2008 ) ) it’s better because it’s made by a far more talented director it’s stil a huge dissapointment I’m not sure what emmerich was thinking or if he even read the script but ambition here was wasted as a result it ranks as one of the acclaimed blockbuster directors worst movies there is a good adventure film to be made about prehistoric people and animals but this isn’t it

10,000 BC is the dullest movie with the dullest special effects, mediocre plot and grim acting. Roland Emmerich must be dying to make a prehistoric movie and he failed to make one look so pretty.