Sephet

Nice game, I'll give it a 0/10. The bugs are interesting and poor character faces made me laugh.

Garbage car physics and driving. The cars are glued to the ground, take zero cosmetic damage and drive as if they were on rails. Even 2008s GTA IV did the whole arcade racing gameplay far better than this, heck I'd dare say Playstation 1 games were probably better and more realistic. The open world nature of Forza is also highly detrimental to proper matchmaking; if they just got rid of the entire world and put a simple menu with a lobby browser and a few tracks for people to choose it would improve the game 100%, because that's the only thing people want from a racing game: to race online and have dedicated servers.

DICE is not to be trusted. Battlefield games have an interesting concept unlike anything in the market, and the gameplay is pretty decent; however, they're expensive, will always be abandoned after 2-3 years and hack usage is rampart because the anti-cheat measures are a joke. A person will make their hacking obvious to all 64 players on a match, doing ridiculous stuff and reaching ridiculous scores, and will still play for months before any action is taken. There's not even a report button in the game! The only other title where I saw more hackers than on this Battlefield was GTA V. It should be noted though that the negative scores (2.9 average as of November 2021) are representative of the state of the game upon release, where the initial maps were quite bad (as in different from previous WWII games) and some people were angry because there were women in game (go figure). The current state of the game is pretty much on the same level as Battlefield 1 which has a 7.1 average user score.

Back 4 Blood is the spiritual successor to the Left 4 Dead franchise, produced by the same studio that did the first game. The gameplay mechanics are a step forward from previous titles, adding aim down sights, customizable perks that open up new playstyle possibilities, among other improvements, while still keeping the feel and essence of the classic Left 4 Dead titles. However, the game fails at a range of other aspects and is simply not as fun as it's predecessors. The biggest issue with Back 4 Blood is, by a long shot, the fact that all levels feel the same and don't stand out in any way. Add a poor content division on top of that - where several campaigns are grouped together into Acts and can't be chosen individually (meaning you almost always will be playing the first one), the lack of a lobby browser, tough requirements to unlock the other Acts, only being allowed to wipe (when everyone dies) ONCE before everyone is kicked back to the main menu, and the poor matchmaking that makes it so once someone leaves nobody will join in, and you have a game that fails at accomplishing what the original Left 4 Dead did. Overall I wouldn't say it's a bad game but the way matchmaking is done, the poor content organization and that ridiculous AAA price tag have killed it.

An interesting take on the medieval FPS genre, although one that still failed to provide a gameplay that appeals to both casuals and pros and finally break the bubble of it's niche. Ultimately it's a game that's only fun for the die-hard players that put hundreds of hours into it, and even then it still has it's cheap, "this feels like an exploit" moments. I'm one of those people, but even I got bored because the devs are **** who simply stopped producing content for the game after they made their money.

Classic Metroidvania experience with a hint of Alien games, where you're constantly chased by bosses far more powerful than you. Great atmosphere and platforming, quite possibly one of the greatest Metroids ever made. And the best part is it's available on Windows!

Cyberpunk 2077 isn't as bad as people say but it's not good either. As most of you already know, the game was rushed and lacks many features; it desperately needs optimization and doesn't even feel like a true "next-gen" title. As far as bugs are concerned though, it is quite well polished; I've found nothing game-breaking or even slightly annoying in over 50 hours, so in that regard this was certainly a better experience than Skyrim and many other games. The AI is really terrible for an open-world game, physics are bad and the player's interaction with the world and it's NPCs could've been much better. This has already been covered in most reviews so to speed things up, the immersive world that was promised to us just isn't there. Even the older GTA games had better pedestrians, drivers and interactions with main NPCs (being able to call them to hang out or date) than this. I was pretty disappointed when the storyline that involves one of the main character's lovers was over and there were simply zero interaction possibilities with her; she just became another random NPC. I'd also point out that I don't like the combat, although that's more of a personal opinion. They took a RPG approach instead of delivering something more action-focused and realistic, meaning damage done/received sometimes won't make any sense (even headshots to enemies not using helmet may take 1/10 of their health) and you'll often stumble without any warning upon locations that look completely normal but have NPCs that are ridiculously stronger, taking virtually no damage and killing you in 1 or 2 shots. Story-wise, the game is brilliant. Excellent acting, engaging and immersive story, Cyberpunk 2077 really shines on this aspect and can be a truly enjoyable experience if you're able ignore everything else. Overall though, I wish they hadn't rushed this game and took their time to deliver us a more polished experience.

Grindy, repetitive af and merely a left mouse button smasher. Just go play Left 4 Dead 2 instead.

Rocket League captures the feeling of a soccer match far better than FIFA, PES or any other soccer title out there thanks to it's action-packed, physics-based gameplay where all the players on the field are actual people. The skill-curve is perfect for a competitive game and there are no glitches/exploits to take away the fun. This is hands-down the best sports title available on any platform.

The finest platforming experience you could ask for. Excellent level design/gameplay with perfectly balanced difficulty, great length (10-20 hours to complete) and a unique and compelling story, Celeste is a true labor of love by people who know what they're doing.

Very fun and creative gameplay with decent puzzles, but the game is just way too short and has very little replayability. That wouldn't be an issue if it had a fair price tag, but what they're currently charging (as of release) is a bit ridiculous for a game that most people will play for 2-3 hours and probably never pick up again.

Hearthstone is a fun game to be played casually, but there's no balance of any kind since the goal is to make you spend money. After you play a few matches and reach higher ranks you'll start facing decks with absurd combos against which you can do asbolutely nothing; all your cards are countered really fast and won't survive until the next turn, and you'll feel completely impotent in the game as your opponent has absolute control of the match simply because he spent money to build a killer deck.

Overwatch meets Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare. Everyone is Pharah, including Genji and Tracer. And Pharah. The gameplay is pretty solid but the whole low-gravity firefighting is just not fun.

An overpriced Team Fortress 2 gone wrong. Overwatch is an extremely casual game that fails at being casual. Remember those awesome World of Warcraft fights where you would spend several minutes dealing damage to an enemy who's behind magical barriers that negate incoming damage and under constant healing from his ally to the point where he cannot die, while your team does exactly the same thing and everything feels boring but you keep going because you have to, until one team runs out of mana and the fight is finally over? Overwatch is basically that, but switch the "running out of mana" part for ultimate abilities that take zero skill to use effectively and may turn the tide of a match. It may be fun for a while but the gameplay is broken and simply doesn't have what it takes to build a decent competitive scene. And then there's the community, which is more toxic than that of an actual MOBA.

Rushed, plagued with glitches, bad hit detection and balance issues, never meant to be fixed, just another disposable title that died after one year so that stupid people could purchase their next low-quality overrated game.

Fun game to play with family and friends, has the best host of maps in a Mario Kart title, but it's pretty unbalanced. Bikes are way superior to karts and the online matches are just too brutally competitive for a casual game.

Very fun title to share your creations with friends, but this is not a complete Super Mario Bros creation tool, as it lacks a lot of the things and possibilities we see on the classic Super Mario games.

A worthy sequence to the original game, unlike Dead Space 3. The PC port is a bit flawed though, had a lot of trouble during the parts where you need to repeatedly smash a button.

I'm no fan of Nintendo and thought this would be another overrated game, but after playing for a few minutes Ive come to realize that it deserves all the praise it's been getting. Packed with a beautiful graphics art style and very intuitive and immersive game mechanics, the interaction with the world around you is amazing and the open world, do-whatever-you-want gameplay style has been very well implemented. The combat system is a bit too simple imo (as expected of a 3rd person hack-n-slash), but that's compensated by the variety of tactics needed to kill different enemies, as well as stealth approaches being present. Would give a 10 score if it wasn't a console exclusive title, which restricts a lot of fans from playing it.

Insurgency takes the good elements of more realistic and tactful games like Arma and Red Orchestra 2 and removes the massive maps and endless walking, delivering a fast-paced, intelligent FPS game unlike anything in the market. NOTE: Do not be afraid to buy this on 2017, the community is still pretty active and will remain so until the sequel, Insurgency: Sandstorm, is released in 2018.

One of the most compelling RPGs I've played in a long time, Skyrim presents players with all they could ask in this genre: good story, wonderful graphics and ambience, immersive and non-repetitive quests, beautiful and diversified environments, attractive game mechanics (casting spells has never been so fun) and a highly appealing theme (vikings and dragons can't go wrong). I must admit it's hard to stop playing, even after completing the whole game twice. BUT, there's the feeling that something is missing. What could it be? Well, once you get past the distractions, you will realize how utterly broken this game is; it's highly unbalanced in every possible aspect, and it favors exploiting the game's leveling mechanics instead of actually playing in order to level up your skills. If you choose to be a wizard, you will soon realize that magic is pretty weak once you reach a certain point in the game or select a higher difficulty, because the only way to increase magic damage is picking two perks that will (together) boost it by 50%, and that's it. As for the weapons, skill value and perks will increase it's damage by 215% or more (depending on the weapon), and it can be improved with smithing to give over 800% it's initial damage, without cheating. This can be achieved by using your alchemy skill to make potions that increase enchanting, then drink it and enchant your equipment to boost alchemy, repeat the process several times until you have the best possible enchantment potions, then use it to enchant armors which will boost your smithing skill, wear it, drink a smithing potion made with your best alchemy boosting equipment, and, finally, improve your weapon at the grinstone. Then you drink another potion to boost your enchanting and put enchantments on your armor that will increase damage output from weapons. This is the formula for power in Skyrim. I know, it sounds crazy. Anyway, while a Mage will start the game dealing 8 damage with initial spells and improve to a maximum of 80 damage with the top spells and perks, a Warrior or Archer will begin dealing about the same ammount of damage with inferior weapons and skills, but will have his damage improved to over 650 with top enchantments and weapons. And this is only a small example of how unbalanced and exploitable Skyrim is. Once you have your enchanted equipment, all other items you find in the game are just useless and inferior. Skyrim allows the player to save/load at any time, another exploit that takes the fun out of the game; what's the point of having the thrill of being caught pickpocketing when everyone saves the game before such actions to prevent failure? You will save before doing anything in this game to assure your success, because the game allows it. I can't give Skyrim a higher score because, even though it is awesome, it was not tested and balanced before it's release nor patched later, it is broken and will always be.