The game is basically good, but it suffers from a very cumbersome UI. That's a problem that will need fixing. It effectively portrays how empires fall due to internal and external causes, the latter often stemming from internal weaknesses. If the UI can be made more engaging, the game could be a hidden gem.
I only want to play and play and play again. The game has things that are relatives to other games from Paradox. So, It has the complexity skills nets of Víctoria 3, the militar logistic dificulties of hoi, a little personalities legacy of crusaders kings. We are talking about a game that can bring us thousands of hours of happiness.
He comprado este juego en anticipado. Es una estafa, repito es una estafa. Un juego inacabado que te lo venden por 120€. No es lógico que si lo compras en anticipado este acabado porque pagas por ello?
I had played hoi iii, andI it was for me very difficult compared with the second and the first. Hoi iv seems complex but intuitive. It has a learning curve very great but the system helps you very much. I know it is an old game but very deep. In my first gameplay I have chosen Germany. I ally with URSS and say to me,the victory is mine. But USA declared the war on me when I invaded Checoslovaquia. Now i had three fronts, Maginot, Danemark and Checoslovaquia. I resisted but Poland united into allies and that was my finish. The next will be better.
Ara is not a normal civ. It's more like a micro-managed city builder where instead of controlling a city, remember the Caesar series, we manage an empire. Here the important thing is not wars or religion, which have a certain importance, but rather that the game is won by prestige achieved by the well-being of citizens by supplying their pyramid of needs. It is true that war and religion influence but they play a secondary role. It is a 4X, but victory is better achieved by the pen than by the sword. I repeat, it is not a civ. His style is a mix of Humankind with Anno management. Positive point, anyone who likes these games of numbers and opening and closing tabs will be in their element. Negative point, depending on how you look at it, the very steep learning curve. I like difficult games so I give it a nine.
Okey, millennia es un juego de estrategia 4x. Civ vi también lo es, pero la IA está a años luz del primero. No es de recibo que comiences el juego y la primera civilización que te encuentras te declare la guerra sin ningun motivo. No le has hecho daño a nadie ni has favorecido a uno de sus enemigos. No pido que se convierta en un simulador diplomático, pero si que tenga acciones lógicas como las tiene civ vi. Luego goza de un apartado visual deficiente, el UI es malísimo y las batallas sobran tal y como estan hechas. Vengo jugando a 4x desde hace 25 años y no hay nada que supere al Sid Meier's AlphaCentauri. De verdad, que en 25 años no se haya mejorado nada los 4x? Seguiremos buscando.
The people think that Victoria would be a Total War like game, but here the war is not the important. In Victoria 3 the chieft Is the diplomacy and you play the war only when the diplomacy Falls. Your country can be the Best, but a fatal error in this thing can make you fail like the worst player in World countries.
If you want to play depth battles, play Total Wars. If you want diplomacy, economic administration, political intrigues, ... Play Victoria 3. I give a 9.5.
The Game is a mix betwen Crusaders Kings and Civ. When you play it, seems like the Gameplay doesn't need of your decisions. It's very random, not like CK or Civ. In Spain, we say "quien mucho abarca, poco aprieta"
A very good game. Tactical rol with a lot of strategic. The game ist nearer from expeditions rome than wasteland. Other form of see the old medieval England and the Arthur legend.
Jugué a Humankind cuando salió en pc. Entonces era un juego aburrido y con una IA horrible. Ahora en 2024 los parches y dlcs han hecho su efecto y han mejorado mucho la jugabilidad. Tiene unas mecánicas propias diferentes a cualquier civ like, un arte independiente y una diplomacia más profunda que muchos juegos 4X. Lo recomiendo ahora.
I do not like The zombie's tales, but this has a immersive atmosphere and makes you fell a constant tension with puzzles and combats again wolfmen and black criatures. One of the games I have played I like more.
Cyberpunk 2077 would be a great game If It hasn't so many bugs and crashes that make It unplayable, inclusive in ps5. The story is not bad, but the combat, I think, is Broken. It is a triple A Game, but other titles double A like The Outerworlds are in same level and have nothing envidiable with The polish Game. If you want to play it, It is better than you play The game in February with The ps5 versions and all The actualizations. Enjoy It in February. I have played It and I think it is recomendable if you want enjoy The gaming.
Valhalla is a great game in the same level of Ghost of Tsushima. An interesting story in the times of viking invasions of England. The game changes for better the mechanics of Odyssey and Origins. The combat is looking at The level of Odyssey, and The freedom is bigger than in other titles of the saga. The game comes back to sandbox. Welcome again!!!!
I think that this is a very depth and good Game, but the Game is devaluated by a horrible mix of Bugs and crashes that make It unplayable. I'm sorry but this is The crude reality.
A good Game with impresive graphics but too with same mechanics all time. When you play at first time you see a pretty videogame, but then It seems bored of making similar things killing mongolians and ronins during the rest of The play. Not a ten experience.
