Advertisement

Ichigo16

User Overview in Games
7.1Avg. User Score
User Score Distribution
positive
8(62%)
mixed
1(8%)
negative
4(31%)
Highest User Score
Lowest User Score

Games Scores

May 14, 2025
Clair Obscur: Expedition 33
10
User ScoreIchigo16
May 14, 2025
Amazing game so far and i've not yet finished it. Graphics 10/10 - is great as expected of UE5, but it's the artstyle that's truly impressive here, honestly the whole world is truly vibrant and beautiful. I give it max score here Gameplay 10/10 - is the part that surprised me the most, i'm fairly familiar with turn based system from older Final Fantasy games, but here it's been modernized by adding in a dodge and parry system in combat, also the many options possible for build makes it great, while on FF this game was clearly inspired by those games and they certainly live up to old final fantasy at it's best - square enix should take notes lol. Sound 10/10 - Voice acting is excellent, same with music, but it's not the best i've ever heard - still it's solid overall Plot 10/10 - no spoilers but story's great, just wait till you see first act end lol PC Performance 8/10 - This is a tough one and depending on your rig, but what it boils down to is UE5 is same as always. With my RTX4080 in 4K/Ultra(shadows set on high)/DLSS Balanced (DLSS4 override) i'm getting roughly 60-70fps, it's not terrible fps, but not great either, what is a letdown is a lack of Frame Generation implementation in this game - it would work very well in this game. On the upside i've not seen any stuttering aside from acceptable level of traversal stutter, that's inevitable in UE5. Conclusion: This game is amazing and a must play title for every gamer in my opinion, on top of the quality of this game, is it's pricetag - you can buy it on LAUNCH for 40$ US - this in day and age where just last week Microsoft announced their slop games are moving up to 80$ lol.... So buy the game, support the devs and more important have fun.
Report
PC
Dec 2, 2024
Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine II
10
User ScoreIchigo16
Dec 2, 2024
Amazing game. Great campaign - a bit short though. PvE and PvP is a lot of fun and it runs rock solid A bit of warning though - you do need strong modern CPU for this game, my 13600k is good for around 100 fps.
Report
PC
Nov 2, 2024
Dragon Age: The Veilguard
3
User ScoreIchigo16
Nov 2, 2024
It's a massive disapointment, i would say this is kinda repeat of Starfield. I'm saying this as a long time Dragon Age fan, who played all 3 games multiple times. Same with Mass Effect, Kotor and even Jade Empire. The game is just weak, weak writing, runs like crap for me, gameplay is fairly boring and on top of that there's DEI which is way too forcefully pushed - something nobody wanted. I also don't like the artstyle they went with for a dark fantasy like DA, it looks way too much like Fortnite or some cartoon. Bioware is dead. That's what happens when all the people who made great games we loved leave the company.
Report
PlayStation 5
Jan 6, 2024
Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora
8
User ScoreIchigo16
Jan 6, 2024
Graphics: 10/10 - It's definitely the strongest part of the game, simply put it's amazing and stunning, one of the most beautiful games ever made in my opinion and i play most of AAA titles. Music:7/10 Nothing bad but nothing great either i find it acceptable Gameplay:8/10 It's basically just old and tested Far Cry formula in Avatar with addition of flying mount (ikran).Whether you like it or not is personal preference personally i enjoyed it a lot Optimalisation: 8/10 This shouldn't be it's own category but we live in times when we get games that are unplayable soooo. I think Ubisoft did good job here the game is demanding no doubt about that, but it's increadibly looking as well so it's not like in Starfield where the game demands rtx4080 but gives 10 year old graphics. I played at 4K/Ultra/DLSS Balanced and had steady +60fps through entire game with some minor drops - my rig 4080/13600k do keep in mind that the ultra preset has RT within it. The game also has FSR3 but it cannot be enabled with DLSS and game started to stutter for me when i tried FSR3 anyways so i just played with DLSS Balanced instead. Story: 6/10 In my opinion it's the weakest link here it started strong but it just couldn't make people invested into actual characters and lot of lines came flat both from screenplay standpoint as well as voice acting. Overall i give this game solid 8/10 i truly enjoyed the experience and while it's nowhere close to titans like BG3 or Alan Wake 2 it's truly fun game especially for movie fans ;)
Report
PC
Oct 31, 2023
Alan Wake II
9
User ScoreIchigo16
Oct 31, 2023
Pros: -Story is amazing and well written with excellent voice acting and actual actors performance, ending is interesting too. -Graphics are amazing. One of the most beautiful games ever game with amazing effects , RT and very good textures -Gameplay is solid too it's fairly similar to first game but we get more focus on exploration - This is in my opinion very ambitious game, there were many very clever ideas and improvements. I'll not list them to avoid spoilers Cons: - I only have one issue with this game though it is a major one and that is game's hardware requirments which are to be frank absolutely brutal. The game has incredible graphics even on low settings preset it looks great, but it has crazy requirments even without RT. I played this game on an RTX4080 in 4K/Ultra/RT Medium (which by presets sets Path Tracing to medium)in order to achieve above 60fps all of the time i had to use DLSS PERFORMANCE(which means 1080p upscaled to 4K) and you need to slap Frame Generation on top of that(which is not optimal at such low fps image did have problems sometimes. I had 70-80fps in woods and around ~100 in less intensive areas. I know i used Path Tracing but this is RTX4080 we're talking about 1200$ GPU. I shouldn't need to rely on DLSS Performance and Frame Gen. To summarise this is a great game which i rate at 9/10 on the caveat that you can actually run it. I recommend checking your GPU performance before purchase on YT so there's no raging later on.
Report
PlayStation 5
Oct 31, 2023
Alan Wake II
9
User ScoreIchigo16
Oct 31, 2023
Pros: -Story is amazing and well written with excellent voice acting and actual actors performance, ending is interesting too. -Graphics are amazing. One of the most beautiful games ever game with amazing effects , RT and very good textures -Gameplay is solid too it's fairly similar to first game but we get more focus on exploration - This is in my opinion very ambitious game, there were many very clever ideas and improvements. I'll not list them to avoid spoilers Cons: - I only have one issue with this game though it is a major one and that is game's hardware requirments which are to be frank absolutely brutal. The game has incredible graphics even on low settings preset it looks great, but it has crazy requirments even without RT. I played this game on an RTX4080 in 4K/Ultra/RT Medium (which by presets sets Path Tracing to medium)in order to achieve above 60fps all of the time i had to use DLSS PERFORMANCE(which means 1080p upscaled to 4K) and you need to slap Frame Generation on top of that(which is not optimal at such low fps image did have problems sometimes. I had 70-80fps in woods and around around +100 in less intensive areas. I know i used Path Tracing but this is RTX4080 we're talking about 1200$ GPU. I shouldn't need to rely on DLSS Performance and Frame Gen. To summarise this is a great game which i rate at 9/10 on the caveat that you can actually run it. I recommend checking your GPU performance before purchase on YT so there's no raging later on.
Report
PC
Sep 9, 2023
Starfield
4
User ScoreIchigo16
Sep 9, 2023
The game is simply put BORING and that's the biggest issue. Why is there no vehicle to explore the uncharted worlds is beyond stupid it's like MassEffect 1 without Mako - CRAZY. Exploration is boring and it's just repetition of the same thing over and over. Second thing is the graphics, this was proclaimed true next-gen title well the graphics sure as hell don't reflect that, it's not terrible but it's nothing special either they also didn't add very good textures no doubt so that the game would run on **** xbox series s which has lower amount of V-RAM, just look no further than water quality or reflections. Third thing is the Performance and this is where i would score this game a big fat zero. In New Atlantis in 1440p native/ultra(shadows high) i got 60-70fps on 13600K/RTX 4080..... i can get this much in Hogwarts Legacy or Witcher 3/Cyberpunk with RAY TRACING ULTRA. This game has no explanation for such demanding hardware it doesn't use RT / Lumen / Nanite or Unreal Engine 5 while we're at it this game is made on ancient Creation engine which is no doubt the root cause of bad performance and lacking graphics quality. The only good thing about performance is that it's not stuttering and running a flat frametime. As if all this is not enough the game lacks actual options which are critical for PC: NO FOV , NO Gamma Setting, No HDR even though it exists on xbox (it's terrible implementation even so...), NO DLSS even though it took me 20 min to enable it via mod wtf? This is 70$ game why the hell must i correct the devs laziness or stupid AMD under table deals ???? Honestly i question the sanity of devs who game such high reviews, Microsoft clearly spent a lot of $ on reviewers to get them on board. Personally the current state of the game is 4/10 for me, simply bad.
Report
PC
Dec 22, 2022
Warhammer 40,000: Darktide
0
User ScoreIchigo16
Dec 22, 2022
My advice w8 a few months before trying it. At this moment it's completely unplayable, terrible lags and the DC are constant issues. Add to this terrible performance issues and lack of any kind of endgame once you hit lvl30 you got nothing to do. On top of that as i said DC's and lags are biggest issues patches have actually made it worse and my connection/hardware is fine i got like 10ms 300-400mb/s on average but in game it feels like 500+ms. Also to note this game has got zero plot to speak of gameplay is great and smashing hordes doesn't get borring but with all the other issuesit's just not worth the nerves you will get when you will be kicked out of server with no way back 2 min before the end of the mission.....
Report
PC
Apr 23, 2022
Ryse: Son of Rome
7
User ScoreIchigo16
Apr 23, 2022
Rome was great , So could've been Ryse sadly it's not. When i started this game i was amazed at how great it was sadly it's downward spiral. Graphics: This is where this game shines it's incredible not the level of rdr2 or cyberpunk ofc but consider this game came out in 2014 that's insane i give 10/10 Gameplay: Despite ppl complaing about it being repetetive i disagree it's fairly similiar to God Of War ( the new one) executions are fun to do and watch however lack of more skills and fighting options is dissapointing even a several executions involving 3 enemies at once and would have made a diffrence here neverthless it's second strongest aspect of game i give it 8/10. Sound: It's perfectly average there's nothing good or bad about it 6/10 Plot: It's weak very weak in fact it's basiccly giant revenge ark for main protagonist which could've been incredible if there was actually some character building and plot building beside endless slaying of enemies i won't even go into plot holes 3/10 Length: This is not really category but must be stated at the equivalent of hard difficulty it took me a bit over 5h to bet the game which is very short for single player game i infact remember several longer campaings in games like CoD or BF. The issue is compounded by the fact that there's nothing to do after it yes you can theoreticlly play through campaign again but i doubt many will be interested in that the saviour here could have been arena but multiplayer is dead and singleplayer there is a joke i can of the top of my head name several cool modes that could have been implemented there like some survival with increasingly difficult enemies time attack etc. i give this category 1/10 Concluding this could've been an incredible game but it was either rushed of they run out of time or it was just plain laziness i don't know it's just a waste of potential in my opinion i give this game 7/10 i spend nice 5h in there considering i got the game for 1 Euro i find it acceptable but at higher prices it's really not worth it in my opinion.
Report
PC
Mar 17, 2022
Elden Ring
10
User ScoreIchigo16
Mar 17, 2022
Technical-performance: There were some minor technical issues at lauch (for me at least).I've not experienced any stutterings however there were small fps drops but it was very rare and only in huge open world areas.I've played at maximum settings in 1440p. My Rig is 3060ti+i7 9700K /2x8GB ram 3200Mhz and standard Crucial MX500 SSD. Generally my GPU was not stressed and was operating around 60-70% the drops were VERY rare in 90h of playing i've seen less then 10 times where fps was down below 60.I find it perfectly acceptable it's a lot better than for example God Of War was at launch earlier this year. Plot & World: Plotline is shrouded in mystery basic FromSoftware unless you really dig into it you will have some bare idea what is going on ;) . World is massive there is no other way about it. Where Sekiro was too small in my opinion this game is enormous to the extreme the amount of bosses/NPC/Hidden Areas etc is staggering. It took me 90h to explore most of it kill major bosses collect items for achievemnts etc. and that is only single playthrough considering there are 3 endings it just shows how much of content there is. Graphics & Audio From graphical standpoint the game is nothing special (not to say it's bad or anything) it's as expected though anyone who played any FromSoftware game is aware that they never rly stressed that part of game for me personally graphics are acceptable though some textures could use some more loving in 2022.Audio on the other hand is excellent as always the soundtrack from the game is great and creates some very climatic boss battles. Gameplay: Basically the Dark Souls system is back with additions.Those are: -Spirit Ashes - which are basically ghost summons that help you out. -Ashes of War - An enchant on weapons granting special abilites -Some new attacks like jumping attacks ,nice dual wielding, counters after block etc. It's basiclly time tested formula with new additions that keep the system fresh despite it's age. Conclusion: The game is great it delivers what was promised. An open world with countless paths that we can explore at our own **** excellent gameplay with countless exciting ( and sometimes infuriatingly difficult [Malenia - poor controler had some close encounters with table]) boss encounters. It is without a doubt a must play for all fans of souls genre 10/10 and a solid contender for 2022 Game of the Year.
Report
PC
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller