JustWatch
Advertisement
SummaryAs young men, Sam Adams (Ben Barnes), John Adams (Henry Thomas), Paul Revere (Michael Raymond-Jame), John Hancock (Rafe Spall), and Dr. Joseph Warren (Ryan Eggold) join forces to as the Sons of Liberty to try to start a revolution in this three-part miniseries.
Season Premiere: 
Jan 25, 2015
Metascore
Generally Favorable
65
User score
Generally Favorable
6.5
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating

Where to Watch

Not available in your country?
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Advertisement
Metascore
Generally Favorable
63% Positive
10 Reviews
38% Mixed
6 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Feb 3, 2015
80
Kansas City Star
The History channel’s Sons of Liberty miniseries tells a satisfying tale of Boston’s slow burn toward rebellion in the 1770s.
Feb 19, 2015
75
The Lincoln Journal Star
Viewers will get a kick out of how each character is portrayed from what we know today about them from history texts and biographies. Samuel Adams likes his beer, Benjamin Franklin his women and John Hancock his money.
User score
Generally Favorable
57% Positive
13 Ratings
9% Mixed
2 Ratings
35% Negative
8 Ratings
  • All Reviews
  • Positive Reviews
  • Mixed Reviews
  • Negative Reviews
Feb 4, 2015
10
misti-eyez
I really liked it, I recorded it on dvr and had a marathon, couldn't head off to bed until I'd watched it all. Yes some parts didn't ring true to what some were taught in school as children, but I enjoyed it non the less.
Jan 29, 2015
10
Richarduses
This is a very good series indeed! Very nice filmeffects and acting. Im hoping for more seasons of this! Though all of the details may not be correct, it tells of a time when ordinary men oppose the tyranni of a foreign king.
Jan 22, 2015
75
San Francisco Chronicle
If you want a history lesson, stay in school. Otherwise, there are enough facts in Sons of Liberty to add some ballast to a ripping good saga.
Jan 23, 2015
67
Newsday
It's a cut above boilerplate, with good production values and decent performances.
Jan 26, 2015
60
New York Magazine (Vulture)
Although this miniseries stages large-scale action reasonably well (with the occasional lapse into visual clichés, such as the silent/slow-motion Boston Massacre) and has a marvelous atmospheric quality, it seems more generic and un-special the more conventionally "exciting" it's trying to be.
Jan 26, 2015
50
Los Angeles Times
At its best, The Sons of Liberty captures in admirable detail the cleverness of the rebels, in their smuggling efforts and ability to amass and hide guns and ammunition, their personal bravery and astonishing commitment to a long-odds pursuit. If only their intelligence and ideology had been given the same, or indeed any, attention.
Jan 23, 2015
40
Cleveland Plain Dealer
So many strong ingredients could have gone into this brew, but, no matter how obviously the casting tries to turn up the heat, it's still a half-empty glass of weak tea.
See All 16 Critic Reviews
Feb 2, 2015
9
Dajinxxx
Ok first off. Do not bash this for its historical content. As if anyone that is really concerned with actual real historical facts watches the History channel for accurate retelling of history anyway. If so that is a personal problem of yours. Go to the Library and read a book. It was entertaining. That is what television is all about. Of course they made stuff up. Its tv. Good visual effects. Awesome musical score. I know my American History. I was amused at this programs retelling of the battle of Bunker Hill. We all know that it was Breeds Hill. They left out the important events such as the Tax Act and the Sugar Act. They knew those were not as entertaining as the Boston Tea Party and the Boston Massacre. Face it, American History as important and interesting as it is, does not always make the best TV. Someone needs to check Samuel Adams Brewery stock for this month because they were pumping out the beer ads.
Aug 8, 2015
5
yardash
Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinin İngilizlerden bağımsızlaşmasını anlatan ve bu süreçteki kurucu babalar diye de bilinen isimlerin üzerinden bunu aktaran bir dizi. Çok başarılı bir çalışma değilse de tarihe meraklı olanlar için kısa bir özet denilebilir. Kimin kim olduğu kısaca aktarılmış...
Feb 12, 2015
5
Alterd
[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]
Feb 4, 2015
2
bruce42
I gave it a 2 because the story gave a sense of the feelings during that period. It gets a F for historical accuracy. And the thing is, it did not have to be. They could have gotten many things right and still had a great story. The most glaring of many mistakes was the failure to show why Gage left Boston. Washington with the help of John Knox put a cannonade on Dorchester Heights threatening the fleet. He left to preserve the fleet. Otherwise he would have not of left. It is a great story. Really disappointing for those, unlike the critics, who know the history.
Jan 29, 2015
2
MrsFitz
[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]
See All 11 User Reviews
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Related Content: ijumpman | fishie fishie | lucha libre aaa heroes del ring | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten medic | disgaea 4 a promise unforgotten pirohiko ichimonji | four in a row 2010 | zombie square | super sniper hd | the will of dr frankenstein | chuck e cheeseand39s party games alley roller