User Reviews

The sea brings us surprises, science fiction, suspense and mystery. I recommend it, at least the location is new.

(Mauro Lanari) Undecided about its own shape, it switches between creature feature, epidemic thriller and environmental drama without anything disturbing, but with the certainty of clumsily imitating far better films. Blasphemous compare it to Ripley's saga.

[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]

**** useless **** ginger idiot mongo cp dumb character. I was happy when the **** got punched

A total waste of time. The pace is boring, the concept of whatever it is that is killing them is barely worked out and makes little sense. It is just a weak story with rather flat characters. Yawn!

Finally! A movie with an ending I didn't hate. Seems like all these modern movies get off on trying to throw you a super lame curveball in the last 3 minutes that actually make you go from liking a movie to hating it. This one had an ending that only made the first parts of the movie stronger. You know, the way an ending should be. Great acting, cool premise, eerie vibes. The only movie I have recommended in a while.

This is a very good nautical thriller that borders the horror genre. Upfront, you will see some disturbing images during a viewing of this film, but for the most part it’s all done in taste or for the explicit reason of progressing the story. All of the elements that make a good movie are well balanced here. The casting and dialogue are wonderful. The directing and cinematography is fantastic. The setting and acting are solid. The problem is we’ve seen it all before, possibly in TV shows and other movies you hold dear. While it’s not the most original story, I still believe that it is worth a watch. I think the weakest part of the film is the music. It’s more ethereal so the instrumentation doesn’t fit with the setting for my tastes. Mostly electronic it does it’s job to underscore the drama on screen and wasn’t good or bad, it’s just unmemorable for a film where the visuals and visual effects are pretty good.

almost a complete waste of time aside from maybe 3 decent parts. honestly it isn't even a horror film and the critics must be crazy to compare it to alien or the thing.

Sea Fever (2019) Sinopsis: La tripulación de una embarcación irlandesa pierde su rumbo en alta mar. Su vida corre peligro ya que un parásito ha hecho acto de presencia en su suministro de agua. Opinión: La trama no tiene nada del otro mundo pero aún así tiene potencial, a nivel audiovisual está bien hecha como para ser una película independiente, efectos especiales aceptables, lo único malo es que se me hizo demasiado lenta, aún así me gustó. Valoración: 3.5 de 5

At first I thought I might not like this movie. It had a really slow start. I hate most modern horror movies. This one was great. The cinematography, acting and writing were great. The special effects were amazing. My only critic was that a few of the charters made decisions that didn't seem correct.

An impressive eco-thriller that could do with more clearly delineated characters The debut feature from writer/director Neasa Hardiman, Sea Fever examines such issues as humanity's disregard for the size of our ecological footprint, the knee-jerk argument that if something hitherto unknown can't be exploited for profit then it should be destroyed, and Mankind's utter insignificance in the face of the wonders of nature. Heavily influenced by Alien (1979), The Thing (1982), and David Cronenberg's body horror films, it could do with some refinement, especially in terms of characterisation, and the dénouement is a little anticlimactic, but Hardiman gets the atmosphere spot on, and overall, this is an impressive debut. Siobhán (Hermione Corfield) is an all-work-and-no-play doctoral student studying marine biology who is told that she needs to get practical experience outside the lab and so her professor has organised for her to join a fishing boat - the Niamh Chinn-Óir. Owned by Freya (Connie Nielsen) and captained by her husband Gerard (Dougray Scott), the boat hasn't been doing too well recently and money is tight. However, Gerard has been tracking a huge shoal of fish and believes their luck is about to change. Upon sailing, Gerard sees that the shoal has moved into an exclusion zone, but without telling anyone, he too enters the zone. No sooner has he done so when the Niamh hits something and becomes entangled, and Siobhán is stunned to see huge bioluminescent tentacles arising from the deep and attached to the hull. Back on board, she's thrilled to announce they may have encountered a creature unknown to science, but when it becomes apparent that the tentacles are secreting dangerous microscopic parasites onto the Niamh, the crew find themselves in a fight for survival. In a post-screening Q&A with Hardiman at the film's Irish première, she said that one of the main ideas behind the story was to offer a corrective for films which demonise or are critical of the scientific method. In this sense, there's a lot more hard real-world science than you might expect, including some fairly detailed discussions of the possible biochemistry of the creature and hypotheses as to why it behaves the way it does. In the latter half of the film, a lot of time is given over to discussions of whether the Niamh should head back to Ireland, with Siobhán trying to make the others understand the devastating ramifications that could result from introducing the parasites into a population centre. All of this doesn't quite position the film in the realm of science-fact, but it certainly helps to lend the narrative a stronger sense of real-world verisimilitude. Science is also important thematically insofar as one of the main issues is that the creature may not be acting aggressively. In this way, Hardiman refuses to demonise it, and from the moment of its discovery, Siobhán consistently argues that the crew must protect it. On the other hand, Gerard sees it as something to be used for profit, and later as something to be destroyed. Aesthetically, there's a merciful absence of jump scares and, apart from one scene, there's very little gore. Instead, the film's horror elements are based more in the intricate sound design, Ray Ball's production design, and Ruairí O'Brien's cinematography. The three work in tandem to make it impossible for the viewer to ever forget that we're on a ship isolated at sea – from the constant creaking and sound of lapping water to the claustrophobic quarters to the handheld and often dimly lit photography. In terms of problems, the most significant is that even given the small cast, there isn't a huge amount of character differentiation, with the Niamh's crew largely interchangeable. One of the reasons films like Alien and The Thing are considered classics is because of how good the character individualisation is – every person in both of those films is a distinct individual with a clearly defined set of character traits that sets him or her apart from the others. Sea Fever's failure to do this makes it harder to care about these people, which makes them feel expendable. It's a shame, because with just a little more work on the screenplay, the film could really have been elevated into something special. Another small gripe I have is that the conclusion is anticlimactic; it works very well thematically, but it's weak in terms of drama or tension. Mixing body-horror with elements of a creature-feature garnished with some eco-friendly themes, Sea Fever is a very enjoyable film and an impressive debut feature. Although its broader genre beats offer nothing we haven't seen before, it still manages to feel like its own thing with its own things to say. It could do with a better balance in terms of the plot/characterisation ratio, but the unexpected focus on science and ecological themes mean it rises above the monster movie clichés you might expect.