User Reviews

Provocative and hostile, and a lot of it only seeks to impress and shock the viewer. I took a lot of points from it because of that. You can't claim to be authentic when you don't give your narrative a genuine feel and Holiday stumbles upon it a lot. Plus it borrows too much from Haneke to claim its own identity.

Palpably tense and thematically complex, this is deeply uncomfortable viewing, with a graphic but wholly justified **** scene The story of a sybaritic gangster's moll, Holiday delights in upending generic norms. In this sense, it's thematically similar to Coralie Fargeat's **** thriller, Revenge (2017), which also tackles androcentric genre tropes. First time director Isabella Eklöf has cited both Gaspar Noé and Ulrich Seidl as influences, and as in much of their work, it's difficult to tell whether she's conveying a point about an inherently amoral human condition, or just daring the audience to be offended. Co-written by Eklöf and Johanne Algren, the film is clinically detached from its subjects, but is it a post-MeToo narrative or an exploitative recreation of the male gaze? There are problems – it eschews narrative momentum and conventional character arcs, and has no interest in pathos – but this is an impressive debut. The film tells the story of Sascha (Victoria Carmen Sonne), a young woman holidaying with her older boyfriend Michael (Lai Yde), and a group of his employees at a villa in Bodrum. Shortly after arriving, she meets Dutch man Thomas (Thijs Römer), and soon they're hanging out. However, Sascha never mentions she has a boyfriend, nor that he is a violent drug dealer who expects people to do exactly what he wants. As mentioned, Holiday reminded me of Revenge; both are debut features from a young female director, both turn androcentric paradigms on their head, both are set in an almost exclusively male milieu, and both are highly confrontational (in Revenge, Fargeat makes the audience complicit with the male gaze by visually commodifying the body of the only women in the film, whilst in Holiday, Eklöf forces the audience into the position of a passive witness to a horrific ****). Thematically, they're also connected, albeit by way of inversion - Revenge is about a woman fighting back against the men who have exploited her; Holiday is about a woman either unable or unwilling to engage in such a fight. Importantly, the **** scene (which is shot at a dispassionate distance in a single take) is framed by two key scenes. In the first, one of Michael's employees is beaten for a minor error, and in the second, desperate to get back into the group's good graces, the man hands out expensive gifts. The point is clear; just as he becomes more loyal after a violent reprimand, so does Sascha slide more into her role as sexual plaything. The **** scene is also an excellent example of showing rather than telling. During the scene, someone is seen coming down the stairs, although we only see their legs as they stop and retreat. This character, whoever it is, is thus doing something that Eklöf refuses to allow the audience to do – close our eyes to the horror of what we're witnessing. This speaks to a societal instinct to evade that which causes repulsion, with Eklöf suggesting that closing one's eyes to suffering and violence doesn't mean it goes away. Although Sascha is blameless when it comes to the ****, in other ways, she's complicit with her own exploitation. Crucially, she's more concerned with accruing materialistic trappings than with the humiliations she must endure in order to accrue them. This is not a story about a woman too beaten down to try to leave, it's a story about a woman who knows that if she leaves, she will lose her meal ticket, and in this sense, the film is partly a critique of materialism. Aesthetically, the film is extremely controlled. For around an hour, next-to-nothing of consequence happens. There is method in Eklöf's restraint, however, with the narrative somnolence generating significant tension through a defamiliarisation of the mundane, rendering it unsettling. A karaoke session, in particular, is almost unbearably taut as we wait for an explosion of violence that may or may not come. Here, and elsewhere, Eklöf plays with audience expectation, especially genre conditioning; we're used to seeing things kick off in films about drug dealers, so we expect the same from Holiday. In terms of problems, the lack of forward momentum will lead some to find the film boring, whilst the lack of character arcs will see others accuse it of being underwritten. Some people will also see the **** as unnecessarily degrading. And although all of this is by design, it has to be said that Eklöf does push non-incident past breaking point, and her refusal to develop the characters does make it difficult to empathise with anyone, including Sascha. These problems notwithstanding, Holiday is an impressive first feature. Essentially about a woman who can adapt to anything so long as she has a credit card, it's bleak and difficult to watch, but it's also masterfully constructed and thematically complex. Pushing the boundaries of how a woman's body can be used on-screen, Eklöf asks questions without providing answers. Finding them is our job.

An Affordable Vacation. Holiday Eklof's version of uprising the feminism policy is probably the most entertaining of all. Over the past few years, there has been a flood of such genre films in the industry to support and celebrate this change that should have happened way too earlier or even shouldn't be there to be changed. And as much as appreciative these films have been, fighting for gender equality and against misogynistic views, the quality has often been compromised and also grown a bit louder than was necessary. But in here, Isabella Eklof; the co-writer and director, keeps it subtle, engrossing and substantial. Armed with a calm screenplay, written with her partner Johanne Algren, the narration follows a single perspective i.e. of our protagonist and informs her with a stable pace where she too discovers the world around her along with us. Often or not, keeping the storyline or the character hidden under the curtains, the audience finds themselves wandering on and off track from the film. Fortunately, the script keeps us busy with offensive humor- says a lot about the world she revolves around- and uncomfortable pragmatic interactions with strangers. Personally, I feel this is the film's biggest asset of all, if considered the number of first meetings or encounters or befriending an unknown personality, the half of the film is spent upon it. And this is immensely challenging for the writers to pull it off, the quirkiness and the uneasiness in those conversation are written brilliantly and performed with equal excellence. Take the second meeting, for instance, between Sascha (Victoria Carmen Sonne) and her new friends that she met in an ice cream shop, the uncomfortable greetings itself says a lot about the very point Eklof is trying to make. Carmen Sonne is incredible in her performance, mostly whenever she is sharing the screen with someone she is obliged to be under someone else's shade and she makes sure she still is the topic of that frame. But I prefer her when she is alone, gazing across the sea or grooving in front of a mirror without any care; a magnanimously powerful scene. Her incompetence and ignorance is celebrated in the narration (the scooter and the scarf bit) and is probably why we resonate so quickly with her, her communication grows easy as much as flawed she grows in the tale, to an extent where an abhorrence deed seems pretty much valid, justified. The graphic nudity can be too much at times, but since it personifies the attraction and repulsion factors on the screen with a fair balanced tone, one finds it hard not to applaud on daring to pull off such a risky heist. Her equation with her husband smoothly piles up the card on to the screen, from the first sequence where some deals are broken to the ones that are shook over in the film itself, the loyalty is questioned but then so is humility. On that note, I would like to truce myself on believing that it is a fair depiction on both the sides of the coin, completely unacceptable yet malleable is this Holiday.