No need to go overboard: Warzone 2.0 is an excellent sequel that builds on the very good foundations of its predecessor. Above all, this is not a simple update. The new battle royale opts for a more tactical and "realistic" approach to loot, playing perfectly in concert with other new features (proximity chat, areas with several circles, bases guarded by AI, etc.). As a result, the experience is renewed and still very effective, thanks to a great game engine and top-notch shooting sensations. Finally, we just have a few reservations about artificial intelligence, which should be reviewed, especially given its new importance in games, and for the famous DMZ mode, which still lacks a lot of challenges at the moment. For the rest, it's free and it's an excellent game. Let's go!
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 is a free-to-play shooter that innovates and renews the gaming experience of the previous chapter, adding many new features and changes especially focused on gameplay. The result is certainly good, even if it lacks in originality.
Warzone is the best battle royale video game. It has a few flaws I guess but other than the few flaws and the large filesize it's literally better than the modern main series games and it's free too lol.
Overall, Call of Duty Warzone 2.0 is a better product than its predecessor in almost every respect. The gameplay takes advantage of the small additions of the latest Modern Warfare 2, the positioning of the loot is finally believable and the DMZ mode, despite being in Beta, already looks promising right now. At present, Warzone 2.0 has some gameplay imperfections and numerous technical problems that affect the experience both when navigating the menus and within the game itself. We hope that the situation will improve in the coming weeks, so as not to overshadow the excellent work done by the Activision teams in packaging this experience of absolute importance for Call of Duty.
Warzone 2 comes out swinging with the strongest map yet, as Al Mazrah's design is both visually appealing and well-balanced to encourage more moment-to-moment action and player movement. The sequel tosses in enough new features and changes to make gameplay feel fresh and give a dramatic change to the game's pace to set Warzone 2 apart from the original, and these battle royale matches are still a blast, despite the setbacks to classic features. Packaged with DMZ, which feels like a sandbox hit, free-to-play Call of Duty players have so many more ways to jump into the action and level up this year.
It appears Warzone 2 is off to a very solid start. It’s worth mentioning there are some technical issues, with Al Mazrah’s huge map taking a little while to load, and the occasional stuttering (mainly on PC), but all-in-all, it feels more stable than Warzone 1 did during its rougher periods. Al Mazrah might just be 2023’s hottest destination if this early taste is anything to go by.
Thanks to solid foundations of the first game, as well as mostly successful changes and new features, Warzone 2.0 is one of the best multiplayer games on the market. After ironing out technical issues - which will certainly happen, given the size of the franchise - we'll be able to safely call Warzone 2.0 an almost perfect game.
Warzone 2.0 tries to cater to a wider audience by borrowing ideas from its competition, but it delivers a hodgepodge of ideas that seems to forget what made the original Warzone so iconic.
THIS IS A REVIEW FOR DMZ AS I DO NOT PLAY WARZONE. If you're Tarkov fan you will enjoy DMZ as it's a lot more forgiving and can be a lot of fun with a coordinated squad or even SOLO if you like a challenge. It's in BETA so crashes, bugs, and AI balance are it's biggest issue so far, but what is there to play is something that has a TON of potential. Since DMZ's release it's all I really play on MW2 anymore. It has a very "1 more run" type of feel as the risk and rewards are all dialed up to 11 and you can have some crazy outcomes compared to Warzone. Can't wait to see what they do with the mode considering it's the first of it's kind in a COD and IMO the best thing they did for the franchise for us people not trying out for the FAZE clan.
Warzone was dope...until this new update. The movement is so damn slow and awkward. Some of the new gadgets (lethal andnon lethal) are **** the resurgence map seems pretty decent, but everything is ruined with the movement IMO. I understandwith BO7 , that there will be changes, but sometimesthe best thing to do is leave certain things alone. The movement was something i believe they needed to leave untouched. At minimum, it shouldnt be a complete 180 from the previous version.
A solid 4 **** game is fine, graphics are good, feels smooth on a good PC but the experience is pretty bad. Playing against controller players is atrocious, the time to kill is as close to 0 as possible so in some matches you'll actually spend more time in a loading screen, prematch, plane animation and drop anmiations than actually dropping. It's a very bad experience for most users, I win several matches out of the ones I play so I'd say I'm one of the lucky ones.Matchmaking is non-existent, you get put with a lot of people regardless of the skill and it's a trash experience when some lifeless kid with 100k hours in this shoots you across the map with the help of his controller. There WAS potential in warzone, years ago, they moved in a completely different direction and it looks like the game is just becoming a gacha now.Awful experience on an otherwise decent base.
SummaryAs shown at Call of Duty: Next, Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the sequel to the seminal Battle Royale experience over 125 million players dropped in to play, is set to arrive this November 16, as part of Modern Warfare II's Season One. This massive, free-to-play offering leverages new technology shared with Modern Warfare II, introduces ...