- Boring - Imitation of Transformers (I seen very similar robot scenes, and therefore boring) - Too much CGI - First Avengers was better - Story is highly stupid and brainless (this film is for children)
Film was watchable and entertaining from beginning to the end. It keeps the original star wars style which is quite unique The acting was good. I like the choice of actors. I been reading bad critics on this board but luckily most bad mentioned was not seen/detected by **** we sometimes imagine negative aspects of the films or is this a ghost in our head cheating us this is bad this is bad...". However film is watchable and enjoyable.
I found out one very interesting fact about this film users review is "CONSISTENCY" ... all the negative critics users written are very very similar like: - film too long (3.50h) - film too boring - film has poor story The users which gave negative critics also pointed out some positive thing found in the film similar like: - film has great photography (desert scenes/animal scenes camels, horses...) - film has some great acting performances (but boring story and very long scenes spoiled my interest) MY CONCLUSION: Like the most of the negative user critics I had very similar experience. I was actually very disappointed because I've read so many good critics from users before I watched this film all saying it is EPIC film but as I watched it -> partially/fully overrated... It deserves only three stars and no more. I shoul next time read aso the negative critics before reading positive to see the difference. But likely the critics which are many places consistent and repetitive are likely "genuine critics" or real personal experience. Im not sure if all this positive critics found on board are "truly genuine critics" because film making is big money today much bigger then before we are talking of billions of $$$...so what to think... I learn every time something new... one has to seems read also the negative comments/ratings and if there is consistency there is great chance of genuine viewers experience it means I may also not like this film.... chances are 50-70%....
Realistic footage from a real world & very realistic characters and very good story this are the main reasons I liked film very much. I is very good film and has also values added as 'documentary/biography'....Please watch this film... Thank you very much
Im truly interested into watching a quality films only. And I think I developed a sense of quality film production. This is the one. Totally satisfied with actors and the writing. The only thing which **** is -> the film like this should be longer for 1 hour more like 3.5 hours of "highly realistic film" which **** my attention for the whole film into it and when it was done I wanted more but. If you want highly relistic film and anter into film to forget eistence than action drama hurt locker is for you. A MUST TO SEE.... very cool. actors does not feel to act at all ut so real....
This is terrible film. It is also boring. Tom Cruise is not funny at all (He trying to be sometimes)... this types of roles not fitting this actor. Actually most of the time I got feeling the main actors were completely wrong ones... it is very hard to respect tom cruise in this film because he looks so silly in his 'ein meter and zwanzig' inside the mech enclosure. Wrong actor choice or too much acting perhaps spoils a film. I could not watch the film till the end.
This film was one of the biggest time waists I spent on films. Could not watch it to the end. Only interesting in this film were perhaps the nice looking ladies. The main actor Tom Hardy **** in this film totally. The story is very boring one can fell asleep. I calling this type of movies "attempt to make some ectra money". Totally disappointing.... I wonder why so much good critics everywhere. The quiestion then rises if this comments and critics are genuine (valid)... film industry is rolling big $$... I didnt get paid for writing superGood reviews so far...annyone did it? .... hehe.. :)
