crozakos
User Overview in Games
4.7Avg. User Score
User Score Distribution
positive
15(34%)
mixed
6(14%)
negative
23(52%)
Highest User Score
Lowest User Score
Games Scores
Jun 20, 2015
Hatred6
Jun 20, 2015
Let's be honest. You heard about this game by an article or a video accompanied by the words "A new massacre simulating and super offensive game is in development" or something in the lines of it. To be honest, I've seen worse. The most gruesome thing that happens is when you blow someone's head off with a shotgun. The main protagonist has NO backstory, NO character and NO personality. He doesn't even have a name. The people in this game are basically there just to be killed. They might as well be dummies for you to shoot. The game itself is decent. But there are some flaws that make it pretty hard to recommend. Most of the time you will be shot by enemies that are off-screen, the execution animations will get boring pretty fast, cars can and will one-hit kill you, and on top of that cars take 3-4 shots to ignite. The missions, while fun and open, are repetitive. It's basically the same "Kill X people" thing over and over in different areas. Also, when you die, two things will happen: 1: If you have respawn tokens, you will respawn close to where you were killed and all your progress in the mission will be saved 2: If you don't have respawn tokens, you will start the mission all over again. How do you get respawn tokens? By completing side missions. Most of them are pretty easy and simple. One last thing. This game is not being offensive to pass a message, or even just for the sake of being offensive. It's offensive so it can get free advertisement. Rockstar did it with GTA too. I'm not saying that it's bad, im just pointing it out Overall, if you can look past all the flaws, it's a fun and enjoyable game. Probably even worth a seven or an eight if all the flaws are fixed.
Report
PC
Dec 10, 2014
Dungeon Keeper (2014)1
Dec 10, 2014
**** **** It's as if they WANT to make us angry. They took a classic and turned it into a disgraceful, pay2win **** WHY? WHYYY??? Anyway, is the game PLAYABLE. It COULD be at least a half assed, 5/10 mobile remake. BUT, it is suffering from "MICRO"TRANSACTIONS. And believe me, there is nothing "micro" about a bunch of **** for 74.99$ 1/10 DON'T EVEN TRY
Report
iOS (iPhone/iPad)
Nov 11, 2014
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare4
Nov 11, 2014
[SPOILER ALERT: This review contains spoilers.]
Report
PC
Sep 10, 2014
Battlefield 45
Sep 10, 2014
Compared to Call of Duty, then yes, Battlefield IS better. But it's like comparing 2 turds to each other. You can choose which one is better, but they don't stop being turds. Said that, they also don't stop being the same every year and somehow managing to be WORSE every year. It pretty much feels like Battlefield 3.000000249. Not much improved. The story is no longer smart and complicated but back to the old "Blah de blah de blah China blah de blah de blah Russia blah de blah de blah AMERICA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!". The game's community has certantly seen a decline, since all CoD fanboys have now moved to battlefield which pretty much means "prepare to lose all faith in humanity". Although it manages to keep all interesting features from Battlefield 3, they feel samey and repeated rather than tweaked and improved. The game doesn't require much skill (unlike what a BF/CoD fanboy will tell you). It's just shoot,shoot and occasionally stab/blow up. 5/10 average game
Report
PlayStation 4
Sep 8, 2014
The Sims 44
Sep 8, 2014
This game is crap. The Sims 3 already had some features removed from The Sims 2, but that was acceptable. This game had 89 features REMOVED from the game. It has less than The Sims 3. Hell, even The ORIGINAL Sims had more features than this game. And Maxis actually DEFENDED the missing features by saying "We improved the character creator, added better A.I. and better graphics". The graphics are the same as The Sims 3. Everything you see in the trailer is pre-rendered fifa/madden **** A.K.A. EA's hype generator. To give you an example of how unaceptable the game is, I'll tell you some of the missing features that were in previous games: - No toddlers* - No pools* - No public area editing* - No open world. Everything you see in the distance might as well have been a wall painted* - No sheds, garages ect. Instead you're limited to just a house.* - No diseases* - No public jobs* - No unlimited floors (max. 3 floors) - No party invitations - No private schools* - No garages/garage doors* - No swimming* - No pets* - No seasons* Also, if your computer has more than 4GBs of RAM, you're f*cked * Probably DLC
Report
PC
Sep 2, 2014
Star Trek Trexels1
Sep 2, 2014
This game is worse than Candy Crush. This game ****. First off all, this is not a free game. This game costs 2.99$. When you buy the game. You'll notice that it has In-App Purchases. BUT it handles them in a way that's borderline ILLEGAL. There are 6 sectors in the game, ~8 planets in each one. The game has TIMERS WHICH LEAD TO TIMERS FOR UNLOCKING TIMERS. I'm serious. You can manage your ship as well, but all rooms you pay resources for are **** USELESS. The only rooms that do something are the PREMIUM ones that you buy for Dilythium Crystals. The only way to get these crystals is to pay REAL MONEY. Also, these crystals cost so much, they just wanted money. With 9.99$ you can buy 60 crystals, and with these you can buy stuff. BUT every room costs about 30 CRYSTALS or 4.99$. These premium rooms give you resources. There are 3 resources you can collect, which you will need to UNLOCK MISSIONS. Each planet costs about 10000/5000/7000. THIS IS THE COST FOR THE 2nd SECTOR. You also need to level up, which can be done by, obviously, grinding completed missions. BUT, you can unlock these sectors immediately for CRYSTALS. Oh, did I say immediately? Because you DON'T. You then have to wait literally HOURS to unlock the sector. You also can unlock characters from Star ****! Except, no. Each character costs about 9.99$. STAY AWAY FROM THIS MONEY GRAB!!!
Report
iOS (iPhone/iPad)