Doobie1

I don't get the point of this game. A top-down isometric, turn-based climbing game? This would have made sense during the 16 bit era, but why did they not opt to make a first-person climbing game with graphics of Death Stranding? I wouldn't recommend this at all. Boring, dull, aged graphics, repetitive puzzles.

The perfect game. I am a PC owner with decent mid-range hardware (2070 super, Ryzen 3600), and playing on 1440p with medium settings, all ray tracing features on, and using DLSS, and it's hitting a solid 55fps for the most part - I can live with this and think it's worth it for the jaw-dropping graphics. I have put in 20 hours so far, and I can say that this is probably one of the best games I have ever played, full stop. It combines the futuristic augmentation system of Deus Ex (the classic one, not played the sequels), the aesthetics of the cities featured in WipeOut HD, the rich story-telling and play customisation of the Witcher 3 (d'uh), and the irreverence and gameplay of GTA 4 or 5 (though all in first person). Note that the vast majority of these 0 star reviews are from salty PS4/Xbone owners (or 10 series GPU owners) where the game runs like a stop-motion cartoon - time for you lot to upgrade or switch to the PC.

Utterly breath-taking and amazing game. I'm about 50 hours in and only covered about 30% of the game so far. It runs buttery smooth on my 2070 Super at 1440p, no complaints here about optimisation (as a side note just turn off tree tessellation and it will run smooth) I’ve not been this wowed by a game since the Ocarina of Time on the N64. This game and the Witcher 3 are the best games in the last 10 years.