1030expulsions

Complete garbage. In a normal court of law, supposed confessions gained through torture and threats are not taken seriously, but instead thrown out. There is evidence showing that the National Socialist men who were put on trial were forced to confess to made up crimes, by torture and threats that their families would be sent to the Soviet Union (they would face certain death in gulags). Are torture to defendants and threats against their families even allowed in international law? Who could possibly avoid confessing to any crimes in those circumstances? Why weren't the Soviets prosecuted by Ferencz or others? The Soviets had gulags, committed the Holodomor and Red Terror, but I guess that didn't matter for some reason. Since 85% of the USSR government were jews who genocided more than 60 million Christian Europeans, and they got away with it, it's almost like some lives are valued more than others by the establishment. Another thing is that if I remember correctly, in a Fox interview, Ferencz said he didn't have any court experience prior to the Nuremberg trials, and decided that the case was closed in only 2 days. So if that's correct, then the Nuremberg trials were rushed by someone inexperienced in court proceedings. Interestingly, Ferencz was in the 3rd Army under General Patton, who didn't approve of the Nuremberg proceedings. Therefore, I don't think we should be basing our world view or view of history on the Nuremberg trials due to these weaknesses. The truth is coming out more and more, and clearly this piece of propaganda won't stand the test of time.