Torn Curtain

Despite some weaknesses, the film remains a bold and challenging work, one that flies in the face of the conventional spy thrillers of its day.

Hitchcock was incapable of making an uninteresting film, even when burdened with unsympathetic stars like Julie Andrews and Paul Newman, and Torn Curtain has its moments.

Alfred Hitchcock's direction emphasizes suspense and ironic comedy flair but some good plot ideas are marred by routine dialog, and a too relaxed pace contributes to a dull overlength.

Hitchcock, seemingly too dour or too uninterested to turn in the title's promise of a Cold War ripping yarn, settles instead for a dissection of the limits of domestic trust.

Torn Curtain, which was a commercial success because of the drawing power of its stars, is an artistic flop.

In these times, with James Bonds cutting capers and pallid spies coming in out of the cold, Mr. Hitchcock will have to give us something a good bit brighter to keep us amused.

Sloppy, clumsy Hitchcock thriller. Brian Moore is credited with the original screenplay, but probably his friends don't mention it.

While preparing for his fiftieth feature, Alfred Hitchcock was fascinated by the real-life saga of Guy Burgess, a connected British diplomat who ignited an international scandal by defecting to the Soviet Union. Hitch would co-opt and fictionalize that account with Torn Curtain, the aforementioned anniversary picture, in which a jilted American scientist (Paul Newman) walks through the Iron Curtain when his funding is revoked. He makes no mention of this to his long-term romantic partner (Julie Andrews), who tags along unwanted on an overseas voyage and catches him in the act of trading passports. Never one to let survival instincts stand in the way **** engagement, she then follows him into East Berlin and plunges them both into deep, hot political waters. Hitchcock was unhappy with how this turned out, having rushed through production to accommodate the big-name stars he didn’t want in the first place. He found Newman’s method acting techniques frustrating, Andrews distant and distracted, and the pair’s A-list asking price an unnecessary strain on his limited budget. He also retained composer Bernard Herrmann, a longtime collaborator, against studio wishes, then replaced him following a testy personal disagreement. Suffice to say, Torn Curtain was a tumultuous, discouraging production for the legendary director, and one that doesn’t live up to his usual standards. Which is disappointing, because the story’s bones have purpose and promise. In an era where James Bond was winking and drinking his way through all manner of phony Hollywood espionage tricks, Hitchcock sets out to prove that the truth is far uglier. Our turncoat scientist, an admitted amateur, is far from suave as he fails to keep a story straight or mislead his suspicious Soviet handlers. He’s adept enough to permanently silence one such villain, but the act is hardly impressive. Even with help, he struggles and scrambles to put the guy’s lights out. That scene is awkward and uncomfortable, nothing romantic about it, and lands about as close as the finished film gets to what I suspect (hope?) was its director’s intention. What remains is a case of hits and whiffs. Newman and Andrews provide a terse and unconvincing romance, a stiff partnership with all the fire and passion of a tired old married couple. They’re always running somewhere, racing an impossible clock, and the details of their predicament make us suspect everyone, even those who profess to help. There’s tension galore, right in Hitch’s wheelhouse, but no impetus. Rather, the film employs an extremely relaxed pace, even as half of East Germany presses our spies against the Berlin Wall. A little pep would’ve gone a long way.