SummaryApril, 1945. As the Allies make their final push in the European Theatre, a battle-hardened army sergeant named Wardaddy (Brad Pitt) commands a Sherman tank and her five-man crew on a deadly mission behind enemy lines. Outnumbered and outgunned, and with a rookie soldier thrust into their platoon, Wardaddy and his men face overwhelming odds in th... Read More
Directed By:David Ayer
Written By:David Ayer
Fury
Metascore
Generally Favorable
64
User score
Generally Favorable
7.3
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Top Cast












Metascore
Generally Favorable
64
62% Positive
29 Reviews
29 Reviews
36% Mixed
17 Reviews
17 Reviews
2% Negative
1 Review
1 Review
Oct 16, 2014
100
At its best, Fury examines the psychological experience of warfare.
Oct 16, 2014
80
The film is a bravura depiction of the harsh brutalities of war that, though monotonous, is an entirely rousing entry in the annals of great WWII cinema.
User score
Generally Favorable
7.3
75% Positive
675 Ratings
675 Ratings
17% Mixed
157 Ratings
157 Ratings
8% Negative
72 Ratings
72 Ratings
Apr 3, 2025
10
One of the greatest war movies ever made. An unapologetic depiction of the last days of **** Germany, and the horrors committed by both sides against each other.
Mar 5, 2025
10
The best war film I've ever watched, the story and narration are at the best level 10/10
Oct 16, 2014
75
Pitt is tremendous in the role, a conscience detectable even in Wardaddy's blinkered gaze. But it's Lerman who anchors the film with a shattering, unforgettable portrayal of corrupted innocence. Fury means to grab us hard from the first scene and never let go. Mission accomplished.
Oct 16, 2014
70
Within this gore-spattered, superficially nihilistic carapace is an old-fashioned platoon picture, a sensitive and superbly acted tale of male bonding under duress.
Oct 10, 2014
60
Brad Pitt pulls along this gutsy, old-fashioned World War II epic by the sheer brute force of his charisma.
Oct 16, 2014
50
Fury reeks of self-importance, a strange arrogance for a fictional World War II drama drenched in more blood than ideas.
Oct 16, 2014
38
Fury is a war movie with balls of steel and marbles for brains.
Oct 3, 2023
10
Filme muito bom emocionante e as cenas de ação valem muito apena assistir e o contexto dele e muito bom
Jun 13, 2026
6
Fury is one of those war movies that does a really good job showing how ugly and exhausting war actually is. It’s not trying to be heroic or glamorous most of the time. Instead, it focuses on a small group of soldiers who are physically and mentally worn down, and that gives the movie a much grittier feeling than a lot of war films.What I liked most was the atmosphere. The muddy battlefields, damaged tanks, and constant sense of danger make the world feel believable. You can almost feel how tired the characters are. The tank combat is also one of the film’s biggest strengths. It feels heavy and tense, and every engagement has weight behind it instead of feeling like a typical action **** cast does a solid job as well. Brad Pitt's performance helps hold the group together, but the dynamic between the crew members is what really makes the movie work. They don't always get along, they make mistakes, and they feel like people who have been through far too much.That said, I think the movie is strongest in its smaller moments rather than its biggest ones. The quieter scenes where the characters interact often left more of an impression on me than some of the larger battles. The film occasionally leans a little too hard into drama, but it never completely loses its grip.Overall, Fury is a strong war movie with great atmosphere, solid performances, and some memorable combat scenes. It may not be one of my all-time favorites in the genre, but it's definitely worth watching. A solid 6/10 for me.
Mar 23, 2020
6
War is ugly, dirty and pure chaos. Fury does a good job in telling that story. The bonds the tankcrew has is interesting and well told. Effects are good and the whole setting feels real.
But especially Pitts character is very one dimensional, and the final showdown is just plain stupid. The german troops behaves like stormtroopers in SW. Also I think they could have gotten more out of the tanks.
See Dunkirk if you want a 2WW movie that is good.
Aug 15, 2016
3
The movie has good production value and it can be quite entertaining if you know nothing about WW2. It's a ridiculous movie. In the tank battle the Tiger is all alone. Tigers always had infantry support and were accompanied by other tigers. Second, Tiger crews were highly trained and did not simply charge across fields into multiple enemy tanks. The crews took advantage of the Tiger's superior range and tried to position their tanks where they had a tactical advantage, ideally involving partial cover. The final battle is simply ludicrous. SS units were highly trained and always had scouts ahead. They used flanking maneuvers and panzerschrecks to destroy tanks by firing at their weak points. SS troops did not simply charge into tanks getting mowed by machine gun fire. I just couldn't get into it because of how much creative liberty was taken. It's more of a WW2 fantasy film than anything else.
Mar 10, 2015
3
Quite a lame movie, bad story line, unrealistic shootouts, to drawn out, bad script. Was interesting in that it was the first such movie I'd seen with tanks from that angle.
Production Company:
- Columbia Pictures
- QED International
- LStar Capital
- Le Grisbi Productions
- Crave Films
- Huayi Brothers Media
Release Date:Oct 17, 2014
Duration:2 h 14 m
Rating:R
Tagline:War never ends quietly.
Website:
Awards
Golden Trailer Awards
• 3 Nominations
Satellite Awards
• 3 Nominations
National Board of Review, USA
• 2 Wins & 2 Nominations




























