DragonulX

Description: 2 years ago I saw the game on Steam for free on Halloween and said to play it. At the first 10 hours of gameplay I said that I can't part with the game, but after that I started to see how detailed the game is on the perks side, but to no avail.Playing the game for more than 10 hours, I realized that either during all this time I gave very mentally trained survivors to the game, or criminals with a lot of experience, or the game is very disadvantaged by survivors.I simply felt with the game that the criminal is very op, regardless of what perks the criminal has, or what we have as survivors. Instead, the game gave me a very good Halloween vibe with an interesting atmosphere. It's not something I haven't seen before, but it's a bit **** changer.Skins are interesting, the menu is to the point. Game Model: Graphics: 7/10 Music: 8/10(I love the music from the survivors menu and the rock version of the criminal) Gameplay: 4/10(The game is not competitive for the two classes) Story:(It doesn't have a story, but it has a backstory for each individual character, both survivors and criminals) Conclusion:Make the game better on the class side, I don't think it's ok for the criminal to be so op even if there are 4 people on the survivor side. They are caught too easily because of how many there **** perks are more of a bonus, you can win the matches without anything on the character.

Description:Ok, I'm trying to keep calm trying to do this review, but at the same time I want to keep calm and remain a calculated person, making a review as coherent and concrete as possible about the game. The Good Part: 1) I like the fact that unlike Warzone 1, it is no longer fast paced and the speed of the characters is more realistic so that you can hit someone. This is what I wanted to be added even to the first Warzone because I didn't want to play a semi-realistic shooter game and give me an Overwatch vibe when it comes to character movement. 2) I love the fact that the shield bar is no longer as OP as in Warzone, I think that in the 50+ matches there is no one without saying this sentence: "If he didn't have a shield, we'd kill him" On Warzone you end up you also shoot a full weapon magazine with common rarity and all you would do was break his shield leaving enough life to kill you until you reload or change your weapon. In Warzone 2.0, the armor only gives you a small bonus, but a fairplay bonus that doesn't completely remove the shield from the game. 3) Hit box is very well done. More realistic than the first game, it gives me a Counter Strike vibe, in the sense that it's not even Battlefield to shoot a bullet in your chest and be instantly dead (with the chance to revive from your teammates)but neither does Warzone 4) The hit box was perfect, you resisted, but not as much as the characters from League of Legends and not as much as a mosquito. 5) The game, unlike Warzone, you need a PC of at least $1500-2000 to be able to play the game. Not to mention that the game also has 70Gb. It seems that this time the game does very well on the optimization side, running smoothly even on an RX 480 with 4GB VRAM from Gigabyte: ****/Graphics-Card/GV-RX480G1-GAMING -4GD#kfI'm glad that they finally managed to compress the storage space so that it is not excessively large for players who have a low internet connection at home. 6) I also like the fact that the looting system is better than the previous one. Finally, you can no longer change your weapon on the fly and collect ammunition automatically. Now it is a kind of crate similar to the Dead Drop crate on PUBG, where you can also see selective bullets, trowables, and many other things. It made the game more elegant and besides that it compressed the FPS on the map so that items on the map that offer drop frames are no longer rendered. + There are probably many other positive aspects that the game has but I didn't give them importance, or I didn't play long enough to unlock them. The Negative Part: 1) I really like battle royale games, or please, I liked them when I was younger. Instead, the favorite battle royale games as a child have changed a lot since I gave up on this category. In the first hour of Call of Duty, I thought I had found a battle royale game to remind me of my childhood. I enter the first match, I die, I come back, I kill, I die. I invite a friend, it gives me an error, I exit the game, enter back. And when I want to try again to give invitations. "Buy Call of Duty Modern Warfare II to get all the benefits of the new Warzone 2.0."I thought it was the thing I've ever seen in a video game. You cannot add anyone to the party until you pay $60 or $70 so you can enjoy the game with your friends. 2) It has extremely many errors in the menu. Do you want to change a setting? ,,error, please try again.`` Do you want to enter another match? ,, please try again`` Do you want to login? "There was a problem with Call of Duty Servers, please try again later". Conclusion: For a new game that came out and that says,,A lot of work has been put into it'', to see game errors in Unity seems to me to be shouting at the sky. I do not recommend in any way to buy the Call of Duty games, except for the story and that's it. If you just want the story, better crash the game. It's not worth $60 because at this price Activision also calculates the possibilities on the Online mode, which I want to specify that for a player who has bought on Battle Net and Cold War and MW I gave the following on Online:- Cheaters (a lot)- Toxic players- A lot of kids with controllers using aim assist and they are good at the game only because the aim assist is very op.-And more.

I have played so many good and less good games lately that I forgot to leave a review for this game, which consumed over 370 hours of my life just on Steam. On the Mobile version, I invested thousands of hours, and in PUBG Lite, another few hundred, only to later regret the time spent, especially in Lite, which has been erased from existence despite its huge potential. Today, I want to clearly explain why this game is no longer worth **** the beginning, PUBG on Steam was flawless. There were minor bugs related to textures and mapping if you had less than 12GB RAM, but nothing major. There was a bug where you could fly with the car using explosions, or fall under the map if you exited the vehicle at just the right speed. However, the biggest issue was the number of cheaters. I’m not talking about simple wallhacks or recoil stability, but hackers who could fly like in Counter-Strike with noclip, had infinite health, and stayed under the map to win automatically. These cheaters were eventually banned, but the damage to the game was already **** game’s initial optimization was fantastic. You could run it at 60 FPS even on an entry-level PC with DDR3 RAM. The graphics were realistic and immersive. Everything changed drastically in the summer of 2020. Suddenly, over-the-top, colorful skins appeared at ridiculously high prices (e.g., a simple green, white, and black Groza skin for $10). But the real problem was the Fortnite-style outfits, which completely ruined the serious atmosphere: pink popcorn backpacks, cat-ear helmets, and even stripper outfits from a K-pop collaboration. This change shifted the game’s tone from a military-style battle royale to something almost cartoonish, alienating many long-time players.Then came the pointless updates that destroyed the game’s performance. The map-picking system eliminated variety, and optimization became a disaster. Today, unless you have at least a GTX 1070 or RX 580, the game is nearly unplayable at decent settings. On top of that, the ranking system became a joke. Previously, you could rank up solo, but now you must play in squads of four, eliminating individual progress entirely. This change made the game less accessible for solo players and casual gamers who wanted a more independent experience.Another major downfall was when PUBG became Free-to-Play. Those who paid for the game received no real compensation, and the "Plus+" system was a joke. Over time, the player count dropped drastically, and bots replaced real players. These bots are so poorly programmed that they sometimes spend 10 minutes failing to kill each other, waiting for a player to show up and finish them off. It’s frustrating to loot a building only to hear two bots in a ridiculous standoff nearby, missing every shot and making the game feel **** remaining players are either cheaters or hardcore level 300+ veterans who obliterate any newcomer. There is no proper matchmaking system, making the experience frustrating for new players. You'll constantly die to cheaters who somehow know your exact location, throw perfectly timed grenades, or kill you instantly with impossible headshots. This imbalance makes it impossible for new players to enjoy the game without being endlessly farmed by veterans and cheaters **** make things worse, new updates keep adding unnecessary mechanics that stray even further from PUBG’s original vision. Weapons are constantly rebalanced in unpredictable ways, ruining established meta strategies. The UI has become cluttered with pop-ups, advertisements for overpriced skins, and event notifications that no one asked for. Instead of fixing major gameplay issues, the developers seem focused on monetization, squeezing every last penny from the remaining player **** game has also lost its strategic appeal. PUBG was once about positioning, survival instincts, and tactical gunplay. Now, it's all about flashy cosmetics, pay-to-win mechanics, and broken matchmaking. Even competitive players have been affected by this downfall, with tournaments losing credibility due to frequent hacking scandals and inconsistent rule enforcement. The integrity of PUBG as a competitive shooter has crumbled, leaving little reason for serious gamers to invest time in it.Conclusion? PUBG started strong but has now collapsed. Poor optimization, absurd monetization, a terrible matchmaking system, and an infestation of cheaters make it unplayable for serious gamers. The only ones left are those clinging to nostalgia or competing in championships. If you’re a new player, prepare for a frustrating and unbalanced **** its peak, PUBG was the king of battle royale games. It offered intense gameplay, rewarding combat mechanics, and a true sense of survival. But today, all of that has been replaced with cheap skins, laggy servers, and a community that’s either toxic, cheating, or both. Unless drastic changes are made, PUBG will continue its downward spiral into irrelevance.

Rust Huh, the game that made my childhood better since I was watching the continuity creators on YouTube back when Zombies were on the map. I ended up playing with a friend for about 140 hours, most of which hours were done on empty servers or done by one of my friends using our monthly subscription initiated servers. Initially, I would have several reasons not to recommend the game, mainly because one of those main reasons is the overpriced price. But instead, I won't do this, because from my point of view, for how many hours I invested in the game and how I didn't feel them passing by me, being the game at the same time and very fun, I suppose they deserved their money. Starting with the worst phases of the game, as long as you don't play on a server made by you, you can't really put your soul into what you created or built on the game. In the game there is the wipe term, which at the choice of the owner who owns the server, can be: weekly, every two weeks, or every month) After this deadline, the whole map returns to its initial form from the beginning without any progress. The houses, your items in the inventory and everything you have mined or collected will disappear and you will basically get it from the beginning every time. It sounds very bad since most players of Survival games grew up with Minecraft, The Forest or Don't Starve, where in these games your progress was saved for the entire period of ownership. But it's not really like that, this only applies to servers officially listed on the server page of the game, if you want to create a server you can keep it for life without giving it a mandatory wipe but it will be unlisted and not you can set it as public, if you want it public you will have to comply with this requirement. It sounds decent so far, but there is another part to come. For you to be able to maintain a server is not as easy as in other games and especially since the game does not maintain the server created by you. Either you use Wireless Lan Party programs to invite others if you have a map and want it to run on your computer, or you have to buy a server domain which is not at all cheap unlike what I was used to do until now. These would be some disadvantages in what prevents its purchase if necessary. (You can have a public server with "No Wipe" only if there are no servers with Survival game mode. (example: PVP)In the rest, apart from these aspects, the game is ingenious, and comes to its base with a lot of new features and monthly or bi-monthly **** updates do not in any way damage the game or its image and even revive it every time something new appears because you always have something to do in it, especially if you are just starting out with the game and especially if you have a server with Wipe. The idea is that having a server with "No Wipe" you cannot expand your creativity as you want on it, most of the time you end up making a construction with the walls upgraded to the maximum and then you think that you have nothing left to do being that everything you did you did during the construction of the house. That's why Wipe exists, to evolve each player individually and all starting from the same point at the time of the Wipe. Imagine Hungar Games with Unlimited Respwn (that is if you don't play on Hardcore Mode) and with several players all evolving differently and attacking each other to capture territories and get materials from the battle or loots found on Map. The idea is very good and I wonder how since its launch it has not received an award or a congratulation for this complex idea, the basis of which is the community that continues to create and maintain active servers even today after a long time. I haven't really seen any bugs or glitches, the game is decent on the optimization side and the difficulty of the AI ​​in the game is to be congratulated. I recommend the game strictly if you have many friends with whom you can have a Party or Squad for Raids because otherwise it would sometimes seem boring to you and you would want to take a break with the game more and more often until you end up losing your interest completely, so that later to return to it again being a good game. On the music side, they tried to copy different ideas from other well-known Survivor games that have good music, and somehow they came out, but not how the developers expected it to come out. All in all, it's good, but it hasn't received updates with the music packet for a long time and I'd be impatient to see that. There are many things I could talk about when it comes to this game, but many of them end up having a positive impact on the game, which makes the final conclusion I recommend it with confidence, especially if you get it at a discount like - I also bought it by the way. I recommend to try for yourself to understand much more than from this review,

Description: This game, as old as it is, has good truck physics. Better than many other racing games or bad copies of simulators. It's worth all the money, especially for DLCs that can increase your map by up to 50% in the game without affecting the performance of the game because it can also offer you benefits from skins on the truck to the more special accessories or limited editions in the game that can help you to customize your truck a lot and well to some extent. Game mods, being more of an accessory to the game, can offer you a bit of variation in the game, from changing the textures of the map, to modding cars that don't exist in the game. Game model: - Graphics: 8/10 - Music 2/10 (I hate county music) Gameplay 10/10 - It is very good to waste time- It is good to farm in it without taking into account that you are working in it. - The best game where you can make a podcast on the call with your friends xDStory: It doesn't have.Conclusion: - Don't buy Iveco.- Buy Scania, Man and Volvo. ++())- Also, is not recommended to steer wheel with mouse. The reason why I don't give it a 10/10 is because the game has a rather light physics of the vehicles in the game. In the sense that if you have an accident, no matter if you enter other players' vehicles, or if you get into an accident with objects on the map, the truck starts to rattle as if it were made of rubber. (I understand that this feature in the game is added intentionally as the official truck companies did not agree in the contract to destroy their trucks, but still there was room for better)And besides that, I personally can't stand the NPCs who drive as if they don't have a license and cut off your face or brake for no reason, damaging my truck, and I also get a fine if I leave that feature of the game active because of the NPCs.

In the 3.8 hours of play, also having the community reviews about the game. I can say that the game is mediocre. 1) The game is poorly optimized (I will not give more details, you can see for yourself in the playtest or in other reviews) 2) The balance of weapons is very strange, it reminds me of Call of Duty Vanguard, there the game has thousands of weapon models but only about 4 or 5 are top played. This is also the case in BF2042) 3) The game has good graphics, but that's the problem with it, we worked a lot on the graphics but not on the engine of weapons and things that really matter more than the graphics. In CS 1.6 Graphics leaves something to be desired but at least no one complains about the physics of weapons or minimalist maps. Unfortunately, there are many games in the making or already published that have great graphics, but do not work on what matters most. That's why people stay on SA: MP, CS 1.6, ETS 2 / ATS, etc. Honestly, even if the recoil at PUBG is a little too big, I would play PUBG better than BF2042. There I know that if I make a Win I am proud, in BF if I win a match I put one point less in the review. You no longer understand what the game is like after reviews.

Description: I lost more hours in this game than I have on this account. I played since 2019 the first time when a friend recommended the game to me, and since then I started to like it much more than Mortal Kombat. I find it much more interesting and satisfying than other similar series that contain gore and blood to make it seem as realistic as possible. I finally played the soccer mode, ranked and many other mini-games that I can't remember exactly what they were called. But I couldn't get angry with him even if I had moments when I was playing on ****'s very colorful, and it's a game for all ages. Game Model: - Graphics: 3/10(It doesn't have graphics but that doesn't mean it's not good) - Music: 5/10(It is very little in the game to be able to compare it with others, but it is very good for how little it is) - Gameplay: 7/10- You can play with friends, but alone it's a bit boring and you feel that time passes when you're alone - I like the idea of ​​skins (They are not very expensive unlike other games- It is not pay to win which I appreciate a lot about the game. And even if it were, it wouldn't be a pay to win game model. - The mode with rank is not annoying at all, unless you really put soul into the rank of your profile.- I didn't see any bugs, although there were people who saw some things that seemed absurd to me during the 50 hours of playing. Story: - The characters in the game have lore found on the Fandom Wikipedia site. But instead, the game is not one with a story, as found in the Mortal Kombat series. Conclusion: - Don't get frustrated at the rank or the game because it's not worth it.- Find friends to play with as solo is something else.Score: 6/10

Description:Ok, I'm trying to keep calm trying to do this review, but at the same time I want to keep calm and remain a calculated person, making a review as coherent and concrete as possible about the game. The Good Part: 1) I like the fact that unlike Warzone 1, it is no longer fast paced and the speed of the characters is more realistic so that you can hit someone. This is what I wanted to be added even to the first Warzone because I didn't want to play a semi-realistic shooter game and give me an Overwatch vibe when it comes to character movement. 2) I love the fact that the shield bar is no longer as OP as in Warzone, I think that in the 50+ matches there is no one without saying this sentence: "If he didn't have a shield, we'd kill him" On Warzone you end up you also shoot a full weapon magazine with common rarity and all you would do was break his shield leaving enough life to kill you until you reload or change your weapon. In Warzone 2.0, the armor only gives you a small bonus, but a fairplay bonus that doesn't completely remove the shield from the game. 3) Hit box is very well done. More realistic than the first game, it gives me a Counter Strike vibe, in the sense that it's not even Battlefield to shoot a bullet in your chest and be instantly dead (with the chance to revive from your teammates)but neither does Warzone 4) The hit box was perfect, you resisted, but not as much as the characters from League of Legends and not as much as a mosquito. 5) The game, unlike Warzone, you need a PC of at least $1500-2000 to be able to play the game. Not to mention that the game also has 70Gb. It seems that this time the game does very well on the optimization side, running smoothly even on an RX 480 with 4GB VRAM from Gigabyte: ****/Graphics-Card/GV-RX480G1-GAMING -4GD#kfI'm glad that they finally managed to compress the storage space so that it is not excessively large for players who have a low internet connection at home. 6) I also like the fact that the looting system is better than the previous one. Finally, you can no longer change your weapon on the fly and collect ammunition automatically. Now it is a kind of crate similar to the Dead Drop crate on PUBG, where you can also see selective bullets, trowables, and many other things. It made the game more elegant and besides that it compressed the FPS on the map so that items on the map that offer drop frames are no longer rendered. + There are probably many other positive aspects that the game has but I didn't give them importance, or I didn't play long enough to unlock them. The Negative Part: 1) I really like battle royale games, or please, I liked them when I was younger. Instead, the favorite battle royale games as a child have changed a lot since I gave up on this category. In the first hour of Call of Duty, I thought I had found a battle royale game to remind me of my childhood. I enter the first match, I die, I come back, I kill, I die. I invite a friend, it gives me an error, I exit the game, enter back. And when I want to try again to give invitations. "Buy Call of Duty Modern Warfare II to get all the benefits of the new Warzone 2.0."I thought it was the thing I've ever seen in a video game. You cannot add anyone to the party until you pay $60 or $70 so you can enjoy the game with your friends. 2) It has extremely many errors in the menu. Do you want to change a setting? ,,error, please try again.`` Do you want to enter another match? ,, please try again`` Do you want to login? "There was a problem with Call of Duty Servers, please try again later". Conclusion: For a new game that came out and that says,,A lot of work has been put into it'', to see game errors in Unity seems to me to be shouting at the sky. I do not recommend in any way to buy the Call of Duty games, except for the story and that's it. If you just want the story, better crash the game. It's not worth $60 because at this price Activision also calculates the possibilities on the Online mode, which I want to specify that for a player who has bought on Battle Net and Cold War and MW I gave the following on Online:- Cheaters (a lot)- Toxic players- A lot of kids with controllers using aim assist and they are good at the game only because the aim assist is very op.-And more.

Description:This game, unlike the rest of the games I reviewed, does not even deserve a concrete review.I played the game from 2014 to 2020, I was also a professional player in a team where I was a co-founder of the team in which my friends participated.I took VAC on my account 3 times unfairly without using it and not even looking for cheats or illegalities for the game. I lost an approximate amount of $200 on all the accounts on which I took VAC, and a time investment of 4 or 5000 hours. I tried to submit a ticket to Steam Support, and no one could help me with anything because the Steam policy is filthy garbage and for people who have VAC on their account, we are people with 0 tolerance for the Steam community. That's why I planned to sue Steam for the lost money and especially for a good part of my childhood lost on a game that I would never want to hear about at the moment. - Cheaters in every match - Russians - Toxic - Servers that are not deleted for inactivity - Children who don't know how to play at my level - People who threaten you with death or with the deletion of your account on your personal profile - Trust factor is an ordinary mess and there should never be such a thing- Don't look for players according to my rank - Desert Eagle is the worst designed weapon on the engine side that I have seen. - Hit box in general is much too disabled to match the bullet with the weapon. - Don't put updates in the game that make major changes for the game, instead when you put updates in the game, do it in such a way as to get more money - The people who have unlocked overwatch and those who give a positive review to the game are cheaters who want to protect other cheaters being their own people (The dumbest move a society can make with a game) - The game's anti-cheat is said to be cabbage. I don't think I have to explain why. But for the people who want to get into the game, please let the game die. - The CS:GO championships have started to attract professional people, as even the good ones use cheats - The skins in the game are phenomenally expensive and no one even knows what. I played games with skins that were 100x cheaper than the ones on CS:GO, and they were a masterpiece unlike the garbage they throw at players for $9000

Description: 2 years ago I saw the game on Steam for free on Halloween and said to play it. At the first 10 hours of gameplay I said that I can't part with the game, but after that I started to see how detailed the game is on the perks side, but to no avail.Playing the game for more than 10 hours, I realized that either during all this time I gave very mentally trained survivors to the game, or criminals with a lot of experience, or the game is very disadvantaged by survivors.I simply felt with the game that the criminal is very op, regardless of what perks the criminal has, or what we have as survivors. Instead, the game gave me a very good Halloween vibe with an interesting atmosphere. It's not something I haven't seen before, but it's a bit **** changer.Skins are interesting, the menu is to the point. Game Model: Graphics: 7/10 Music: 8/10(I love the music from the survivors menu and the rock version of the criminal) Gameplay: 4/10(The game is not competitive for the two classes) Story:(It doesn't have a story, but it has a backstory for each individual character, both survivors and criminals) Conclusion:Make the game better on the class side, I don't think it's ok for the criminal to be so op even if there are 4 people on the survivor side. They are caught too easily because of how many there **** perks are more of a bonus, you can win the matches without anything on the character.

It makes sense to bring up the basic idea and the music since they were taken from the movie and the game is not even made to be competitive. Unlike Dead by Daylight, which I said is not competitive. You buy this game more to support the movie than to play it like a normal game. It can be seen from a post that people didn't even bother with the game. He simply just made a game and that's it. The game doesn't deserve a review because you buy it more from the collection than as a normal game. Not to mention the fact that people made very detailed female forms to make more money from the summer DLC. Conclusion: DBD is better, a little bit **** people who took the DLC to have a better view of the female character. Don't Stop, Grab a Snickers

Description: I think it is one of the best games made by Valve so far. He managed to bring something revolutionary that you won't find in other zombie games, and if you do, you'll know for sure that it's a copycat of the Left 4 Dead 2 **** do I say it has something unique? 1) The gore mode that is so good, satisfying, fun, whatever you want to call it. All players are of the opinion that this is very difficult to rebuild, even with the latest generation graphics engines. 2) The solo or coop story mode, which allows you to advance in the story one level at a time, similar to Minecraft Story Mode, except that you don't just sit on the chair and relax. You can also taste the chaos and the difficulty that the game has when you select the highest difficulty.This game, like the rest of the games made before 2015, are games that remain in my memory as the best games played at a time when people did not have high expectations from a famous game. Congratulations Valve for making a game that you have now abandoned like the rest. Congratulations =(

Description: The best puzzle game I could play. Unfortunately, I couldn't finish the game, but not because it was too difficult, I'm not the type of person to give up, especially on games with major difficulty. Although I gave up the game for quite a long time. I saw that Nvidia wants to make a Remastered game, adding the RTX setting to the game, which makes it look splendid. It's a pity that another game was not released, but as far as I know Valve is, I certainly don't think that another game with such a great reputation will appear in front of us. A very difficult game to play, but at the same time very difficult to do the puzzles. It's very good, and the idea of ​​the portal is something that if Valve didn't think about it, the chances were very small that someone would come up with such a good idea. Bonus: Don't play the game when you're drunk or on drugs because you don't understand anything anymore. Or, do whatever you want, you wanted the effect.

At first glance, the game is not the most horror game, the environment jumps out at you from the game trailer or especially from the pictures taken during the gameplay, Ignoring the fact that it is a 2D game, (to some extent) The story of the game must be played after you have finished playing Little Nightmares II. It's that style of game where you can't give many details about the story, because every detail gives you a hint in the game. just play =)

Old but gold. It's hard for me to review a game that I don't have much to show. I recommend you to read the description of the game to understand what it is about, although it is hard for me to believe that there are people who do not know what this game is about and are die-hard gamers.Personally, I really liked the game, even if I only did 2 endings. It's cool that it puts you under pressure at a given moment in the game when documents upon documents to check start to appear because you don't know what to check the first time in order to escape faster. I recommend the game, it's worth all the money.

I'm a big fan of Rust. I liked the game since 2014 when a YouTuber from Romania made a series with the game and it was at the time when there were Zombies in the game. Finally, when I saw that the game when I was a child was a ton of money for me, I started looking for a way to play a similar but equally good game. A friend recommended Unturned to me. The game that, although I put in a few hours, well I can say that this is the secondary account when it comes to Unturned. The basic idea so well executed with graphics familiar to all gamers. The idea of ​​server creation. It is one of my first survival games that sparked my curiosity to find out as much information as possible about it. I recommend the game. And I say this only to spite the people who hate the game because they don't like the graphics.

I'm not a FIFA player, the first time I ever played was fifa 2017 (sort of) and I was on Xbox 360 with a friend. It was crazy, I'm not lying, but I haven't played since then except 1 month ago with a friend on PS4 and it was FIFA 2018 and it was just as crazy.Currently I played in the free weekend with a friend and I can say that it is one of the biggest fails of this year. Imagine eFootball (or the former Pes game) only made by Ea Sports. I encountered countless problems with the game, you say that I was playing a play test version in development and I was a game tester.- First of all from the lack of optimization that the game has (I didn't think I would say this with an RTX 2070 in the computer) but yes, I had some gigantic frame drops without being given alt + tab or windows button and then returning back to the game.- Since there was no rendering of the terrain in 3 quarters of the match, I couldn't even play in 2K because the FPS average was no more than 5.- My PC shut down during the game more than 5 times in 3 hours of gameplay and it's the only game I've encountered such a thing. I don't know what the phase is and if this has happened to anyone else or if it's just me who has a defective PC. But actually during the matches, in the menu, in halftimes and many other phases of gameplay, my PC restarts doing absolutely nothing. I don't know how you FIFA players would have reacted if you don't give a pass properly. But if this happens to you, I think you would have thrown the monitor out the window.Conclusion: I do not recommend it, too many FIFA games that appear and nothing changes to say that it is copied after the iPhone. I'm not saying that the game isn't fun, but it lost its charm when I spent 15 minutes in the game and then it restarted in front of me as if the source was losing power. I'm Out!

The game was made as a joke on April 1st, the developers can't take the game seriously, so most likely my review won't be taken seriously and neither will I since the game is just a joke.Effectively, people have copied the Battle Royale game mode in the TABS theme in first person. An idea that only Landfall developers can do, the idea is that the game could be playable if it wasn't so badly optimized and your camera doesn't move in all directions when you walk or want to do parkour. I'm serious, it was really playable if it met these requirements, or maybe not... especially now that they made the game free and gave access to all people to enter the game with Cheat being that Easy Anti-Cheat is the most weakest of all. But as I said before, people didn't take the game seriously, so I won't take it either, except for the final conclusion that is coming **** Conclusion:Game made at the caterinca with money to be made for free later, and the money on the game to be converted into in-game coins. Codeti are as many as Counter Strike, only within the limits of the community of people who play it. And the basic idea is super simple, so simple that even a person with a maximum of 1 year of experience in different programming languages ​​can create the game in less than 1 month and with a better and more efficient anti-cheat system than the that the developers currently have for their game. It's worth trying it one day, but don't take it seriously because, just like with other video games, the developers don't pay 2 bucks for you and those hours at the end of your life end up not even counting for memories. GG

This game, as old as it is, has good truck physics. Better than many other racing games or bad copies of simulators. It's worth all the money, especially for DLCs that can increase your map by up to 50% in the game without affecting the performance of the game because it can also offer you benefits from skins on the truck to the more special accessories or limited editions in the game that can help you to customize your truck a lot and well to some extent. Game mods, being more of an accessory to the game, can offer you a bit of variation in the game, from changing the textures of the map, to modding cars that don't exist in the game. - Game model:- Graphics: 8/10 - Music 2/10 (I hate county music) - Gameplay 9/10- It is very good to waste time- It is good to farm in it without taking into account that you are working in it. The reason why I don't give it a 10/10 is because the game has a rather light physics of the vehicles in the game. In the sense that if you have an accident, no matter if you enter other players' vehicles, or if you get into an accident with objects on the map, the truck starts to rattle as if it were made of rubber. (I understand that this feature in the game is added intentionally as the official truck companies did not agree in the contract to destroy their trucks, but still there was room for better)And besides that, I personally can't stand the NPCs who drive as if they don't have a license and cut off your face or brake for no reason, damaging my truck, and I also get a fine if I leave that feature of the game active because of the NPCs.