Babutto

It's a solid and hard game to be honest. But it feels dated because of unbearable physics. The storyline is nice through.

I think it is a great **** story is fine. It was interesting to see a mix of Lovecraftian and Frankenstein lore. The characters were memorable. The Eldrich horror was tangible. The gameplay was easy to navigate. There was enough variety of things to do, except maybe a couple, such as the doll. Even the non-negotiable punishments, such as the rope and first coin tossing into the fountain, are acceptable.There are problems, such as necessity to check every inch to get teeth and coins. Also, there are loop holes. More notes and more dialogues could fix the issues. Also, the final boss for S ending could be nice.

It was a great disappointment. The story and voice overs are fine. The music was also great. Yes, the gameplay and progression were boring and repetitive. The real issue was turn-based part with fights. It is buggy and an absolute RNG disaster. Also, the world building is kind of bland.

It is surprisingly a great game. Pros.: the story, design, puzzles, music, aesthetics and choice-making. Cons.: did not notice any. Even "bad" ending and requirements for the good one seem adequate. I especially liked the bad ending music score and a blend of Giger's and Bersker artwork.Recommend to everyone!

What I liked in this game? Music (the best part), smooth gameplay, Miami Hotline style, cyberpunk aesthetics, color palate (surprisingly, even though almost everything is red), South Korean and Chinese language. What I didn't like? The world could have been developed better - the city, characters, exploration. Levels are repetitive.

Well. I can't recommend this game.I am from the generation that played Double Dragon and Battletoads when they were released. I hoped that they tried at least keep the original mood and style a bit, like in Double Dragon. But it is **** game is nothing like the first one. The story is dumb. The characters fail to trigger sympathy. The design of Dark Queen is meh (especially her lines about "empowerment" and "criticism of her looks"). It is obviously made by the SJWs who tried to implant "modern standards," which are visible literally everywhere - from the cartoonish style to humor and "sensitive" characters. Thus. just replay the original and don't bother with this one.There are good sides - "surfing" and space levels present a new design of "racing." There are a couple of old tracks. But it is not enough to change my mind.

A solid experience that grants you a chance to explore interesting level design, transformations of the character and his perception of reality. Alternate endings are interesting, including the methods of achieving them. Nice indie game.

I think it is a solid game. I enjoyed it more than before when it was released. I liked the character of Niko and missions. However, I cannot recommend the game because of stupid MF imbeciles who decided to create a piece of crap called Rockstar Game Launcher. Because of that, I could not even start Bernie's Ocean Drive mission and finish the game. I spent two hours fixing the problem. If the game and developers allow this to happen, then, sorry. Avoid this piece of ****.

I think it is a nice and quite smooth Metroidvania with solid pace and difficulty. The only struggle I had is with the story. Was completely lost in it. But I liked the rest. Rescuing Welsh Corgies was fun.

I played this game upon the release back in a day. Never finished. It was too hard and clunky for me. Finally, done. Yet, I have mixed feelings. The game is extremely dated. AI is dumb. Missions over repetitive. Compared to C&C and SC it is a bad game. Yet, there are many mechanics that could be used later, like cards, research and upgrade, money gaining system. Partially they were reimagined in WH40K and Ground Control games. It is worth playing for those old fans like me and those who remember 90s. But for the new generation, pass. BTW music in the game is cool.

A very nice development of an idea to revisit old franchises and recreate older style and aesthetics instead of trying to restart them. Terminator was a good shot but this one is even better. I was glad to see familiar characters and faces, and Peter Weller's voice. Choice-making was a nice touch. There are minor issues like lip synchronization and physics. But overall, the game deserves its existence and time.

The game aged surprisingly well. It is intuitively understandable, smooth, and hard enough. I am amazed that it was released such a long time ago. Music is great, weapons are cool, the sequence of locations is also cool. Not a linear shooter.

The game aged surprisingly well. It is intuitively understandable, smooth, and hard enough. I am amazed that it was released such a long time ago. Music is great, weapons are cool, the sequence of locations is also cool. Not a linear shooter.

Fun game for a couple of evenings. Humor was fun. The game is easy to play and navigate. A good reminder of how the design was done a couple of decades before.

The best one in the series. Cool characters, neat story, choice-making, convincing interactions and interesting resolution.

Clunky gameplay. Interesting story. Fine cliffhanger. Buggy cut scenes. Smooth experience.

The game is good for WH40K fans. But the gameplay is extremely repetitive, while levels are not very sophisticated. There are better designed old-fashioned games, like Dusk or Hrot, Amid Evil.

It's decent game. Pros.: characters, lore, story, upgrade system. Cons.: sometimes feels imbalanced. Some missions and choice-making do not make sense. Later missions were easy, while mid-game - very hard. Maybe it was the problem of how I upgraded my units. For WH40K fans it is a must-play game.

Honestly, I tried to like the game but failed. I am a big fan of Lovecraft and especially lore around Hastur. However, this game is short, raw, unpolished, glitchy and extremely dull. There could have been more psychologically heavy storytelling, revolving around the combination of theatre, writing, and fine arts. Sculpture part is short and underdeveloped. Composer's part is boring and unconvincing - where is the music? Where is her inspiration? Where is at least melody that should not be listened? Etc.Thus, it is a rare case I leave a dislike.

Man. This game is bloody **** is extremely hard even on normal level. It forces you to save scum and replay. Some missions, even crucial ones, are simple after a while. But the last one is a crazy challenge. You have to think which knights to use, to hire, to return to Titan, how to retrain and so on. All of it reflects the lore of WH40K and inevitably suffering, loss and defeats to win. The story is cool.However, the weakest points of the game are repetitive music, boring as hell, repetitive lines (which should be disabled if possible), slow speed (need even higher increase of quick battle, and, of course, repetitive maps. Just boring very quick. Enemies though are getting more and more interesting and OP.

Always great to return to this game. There are many tweaks that made the game more playable and even harder. But there are some bugs remaining (especially in the end). Anyways, it is cult classic. Fingers crossed for SS3.

If you like DC you will like the game. The only problem I had with this one - it felt less complex as the first one. Everything was predictable and even bland sometimes. Those cocky lines... In the first game there was an element of surprise, betrayal, depth, but here it felt as if many decisions were forced. Still playable and fun with friends.

It's one of the most insane FPS in the world right now. A lot of fun and references to popular culture, previous Postal games, previous FPS and so on. It is worth trying no matter what.

A decent non-narrative dependent art game. There are not many like this on the market. Everything depends on the player. But the game is VERY specific.

Funny thing. I recommend the game but I did not like it at all. I like the attempt. I like how they tried. I liked several characters and missions. But in general it felt forced and boring. Maybe it's just me.

There was a lot of criticism about this game throughout the development. But I will be honest, I liked it. I liked the style, the variability of characters, Easter eggs and secrets. I liked weapons, and especially reload system in the third episodes. There are many references to the past FPS games, like Quake 1, 2, Doom, etc. The weak points of the games are the story - more screens between the missions about the events would have been a plus. Level design of episode 2 is not the best. Third episode is too short. Music is decent. At the same time, I feel there is some potential to develop the franchise into separate characters and also update the existing game. Good luck!

Sometimes, the game feels a bit strange because of the necessity to jump between characters, which kind of kills the pace of the game. But the design of the story, development and characters are great. One of the best games ever.

I think it is a solid game, but... Pros.: Mechs. Graphics. The feeling of the game and succession with the predecessors. Customization. Cons.: Music. Repeatable content. Story. Feeling that there is so much potential but it was not fulfilled

It is a masterpiece. A hard game but truly rare gem that is much better than many non-indie games.

Nice game. Good variebility, characters, and gameplay. I think the game extended the lore and was interesting enough to beat the missions without having the feeling of repetitiveness.

I think the problem of this game is not a concept but lack of variability and concrete story. It is simply a set of encounters and unrelated missions for fans of DND.

It's an interesting game to dive into, to explore, replay, try new roles, experiment with the ships, trading, etc. etc. etc. There is so much depth. However, it did not click in me and I just decided to progress with the main storyline and depart from it. Probably, I am too old for such games, or I don't have enough time, or I am not into the genre. Anyways, I recommend to play it. You won't be disappointed if you like space, advanced storytelling, decision-making and exploration.

It's a fun game if you wanna kill several hours for the rogue-like. But nothing exceptional.

Don't know why I bought it. Laggy, stuttering, bland, boring. It tries to vibe on System Shock 2 (even F.E.A.R. sounds effects are used when the image flashed) but ultimately fails. Don't waste your time.

A good game but still underdeveloped. I think the aesthetics and story is nice. Gameplay is neat. Sound design is fine. But time constraints could be simpler if considering is NOT a roguelike. In fact, it is.

It's a nice homage to Prince of Persia and Another World. The problem is the world and lore could be developed more or less, cocnentrating on gameplay. By now, we have some glimpses on what is going on there but without depth that is a downside because it leaves mixed impression.

It's an amazing adaptation of Lovecraftian themes and aesthetics. It is incredible how the developers approached similar theme and enveloped it into something original, unique and versatile. Enjoyed playing it and trying different endings. Hope they will continue and develop it into other separate but somehow united projects. Wish you best!

One of the greatest projects ever. It allowed to dive in again into the classics of adventure puzzle games. When I was a teenager, I only beat TR3 (with cheats). The first one seems the best among all three. The second seems OP in several missions. Still, I enjoyed all of them. The graphics seem better, the mechanics are fixed, there are some minor non-critical issues. Nevertheless, worth your time.

One of the best games I've played in the last 15 years. Nicely designed, written, simple but with signature aesthetics and gameplay elements. More importantly, inspired by Drive and contributed in popularizing of the synthwave. Must play.

A good game long ago. But aged badly. Boring gameplay, no match to C&C. But some ideas were developed later in Warhammer 40K: Dawn of War. The story though it great.

A weird game to be honest. But very ambitious idea that challenges the medium and merges it with the film.

It's a good game. I enjoyed playing it and diving into the memories of the childhood. No surprise it was hard for me back then. It is still hard now. You have to do a lot of planning and understand the level well. One minor mistake and you have to replay. Moreover, I liked the story and classic Clansy's vision of world cooperation against terror and faschism. The world we never had and lost somewhere on the way.

It was a fun game until after a few levels it started lagging severely. It is quite dumb not to include window mode in the game. Very unlikely I will buy any other projects of this company. Should have refunded it right away but gave it a second try. One of the few worst experiences.

It's a cool game. Pros.: The story. The lore and world. Smooth. Cons.: Could be more mechanics on the train and the car.

Worth playing for Dungeon Keeper fans. Like me. In moments, it is dull. In other moments, it's quite innovative, like surface action.

It's a nice game. I enjoyed it. Pros.: A lot of Chinese culture here. Pop culture references. The genre. Difficulty is well-balanced. I liked the characters. Cons.: Some unclear directions and walkthrough. DLC puzzles and challenge.

That's a cool old-school looking game (Quake 1). Nice level design, bosses, difficulty, etc. A lot of Eastern European humor. I liked the synthwave track at the end.I think the game will be interesting for anyone who likes retro-shooters with three cards / keys, interesting level design, stylistic depth, and atmospheric music. However, I would say that this game is an example that anyone can make a video game driven by passion.

It is a good game. I liked the story and Biblical annotations. At the same time, the game is quite imbalanced closer to the finale. The bosses are much more difficult. If you die and lose your bonuses you gained beating clay dudes, you'll be screwed. To research map was nice. But I think the backstory and more lore is required for each of them. Like in Salt & Sanctuary as an example. Anyways, even though did not like it more than Ender Lillies, I think this project is worth playing as it resembles that one.

One of the few times when I do not recommend the game. There is the principal reason for that: absolutely idiotic instances when you have no introduction of what to do and how to navigate the map. Usually, there is a character who gives you a hint or who asks to help, rescue him/her, navigate, etc. There could be a sign, bones, monster, or something else. So many options. But Catacombs, Castle (with gravity swap), Flooded Castle, etc. Nothing at all. The design does not imply freedom, how it is done in Environmental Station Alpha, Hollow Knight, Timespinner, etc. The game tries to be more serious than very neat and coherent Alwa's Awakening. But these small hints (that can be less visible btw or as puzzles) are absent. The issue with the drowned guy is even worse. Tbh I didn't even notice the guy until I hit the water level raise and SAVE. Why to save? You have an assisting mode. I finished the game. Yes. But will never play it again.

One of the few times when I do not recommend the game. There is the principal reason for that: absolutely idiotic instances when you have no introduction of what to do and how to navigate the map. Usually, there is a character who gives you a hint or who asks to help, rescue him/her, navigate, etc. There could be a sign, bones, monster, or something else. So many options. But Catacombs, Castle (with gravity swap), Flooded Castle, etc. Nothing at all. The design does not imply freedom, how it is done in Environmental Station Alpha, Hollow Knight, Timespinner, etc. The game tries to be more serious than very neat and coherent Alwa's Awakening. But these small hints (that can be less visible btw or as puzzles) are absent. The issue with the drowned guy is even worse. Tbh I didn't even notice the guy until I hit the water level raise and SAVE. Why to save? You have an assisting mode. I finished the game. Yes. But will never play it again.