Valorant

Valorant is deep, complex and it always pushes you to do your best and become a better player. It has everything to offer great and intense matches, but it also requires and level of cooperation and commitment that won’t appeal all players.

At first, this looks like just another Counterstrike clone. But there’s more depth and variety, despite the lack of content.

Valorant isn’t trying to appeal to everyone. It’s trying to appeal to a hyper focused slice of the hardcore shooter fanbase. If that sounds like you, you will absolutely love it.

Valorant leans heavily on its predecessors, but makes use of established schools of thought and the unique novelties of its Agents to create a fresh take on tactical shooters, even if its launch is a little slim. For years, there hasn't been a fight for Counter-Strike's throne; but in Valorant, Riot Games has found a valiant contender.

Valorant is likely to make a big impression on anybody that enjoys competitive shooters, even if it is a little light on content at the moment. Genre newcomers will need to stay patient to push past the initial difficulty curve, but its exhilarating combination of gunplay and agent abilities is accessible enough that reaping its rewards shouldn’t take too long.

Valorant doesn't stray too far from Riot Games' plethora of hero-focused titles. With the fusion of high-level gunplay and hero mechanics, Valorant is both highly competitive and unfortunately too highly skill focused for casual players to enjoy.

Valorant considers a standard match as best of thirteen rounds. Thirteen rounds! You don’t know which team is dominating in three rounds, Valorant? Because I sure do. It’s the team running rampant all over the map. Your Spike Rush mode is only slightly better at best of seven, but even that can drag. It’s all in service of the eSports focus. Anything quicker would be too fast for dramatic shows. Riot has made eSports their bread and butter, so it’s no surprise that Valorant is heavily skewed to that audience. Gone are the days of 1v1 arena fights in LAN tournaments with fullbright settings. One match. One result. One mistake and you were done. There were no upset wins or swings. You did a looping run from the railgun spawn and the keg of health and you didn’t dare deviate because it could all be over with one high-ping hit. Anyway, I’m old. Valorant has made me realize that I don’t recognize the landscape I grew up with. I’ll let the younger generation deal with Valorant’s sequel.

Vrai jeux de salopard, d'enfoirés, de loubards, de mesquins, de rusés et de farfadets.

Good for someone that likes FPS game. Bad fanbase & players that would rage.

One of the most infuriating MMR systems in all of competitve gaming, Valorant is a good time usually ruined by weird design choices. The art style is great, and the gameplay can be addicting, but one out of every three games will have you questioning your existence.

Je donne la note de 4, car pour jouer au jeu il faut un pc à 10000€ MAIS pour jouer bien il faut jouer avec les graphismes bas. Le matchmaking est mauvais, l'anti cheat on est pas loin de vac. Au moins la scene e sport sauve la donne, falcons moneysport n'y est pas (enfin pas encore)

Игра очень хорошая с продуманными механиками, но разрабам нужны только деньги, им насрать на оптимизацию игры, игра грузит цп под 100% просто после того как ты открыл ее (проц у меня не самый плохой а именно Intel core i7-3770k), каждый патч десятки новых багов которые месяцами не исправляются, а в замен получаем только коллекции на 1,5 скина за стоимость хорошего полного бандла на 5 скинов, которые выходили раньше