WLF67

Any way I look at it, I can't help but notice how EA/Dice cheaped out on this one. I mean TDM on the other maps is just as good or better if you do need 64 player close quarters carnage. It looks like they would have only put half as much effort into these small maps than the big ones. so they should only cost half as much. Unless you like Call of Duty. Yes I had to mention it :?

I got It because it was suppose to be a decent PC port, and it was, except for the controls. I your used to a game pad then you should be fine. The story is short and the world isn't exactly huge but it's ok.

The vanilla BF3 maps are a little cramped for 64 players, but these classic BF2 maps take care of the cramped problem. Oman is still awesome with all the tanks. I've never been spawn trapped on these maps unlike some of the bottlenecks in some of the vanilla maps.

As a pc gamer it simply makes more use of my pc than any other game. If you judge it by the single-player, you may as well judge a book by it's title. It's a game where if you invest time to learn the maps, it will reward. There are so many things to do in this game besides shooting. If you get bored, put C4 on a jeep and drive into a tank. Use your stealth/suppressors to sneak up and kill with repair torch. Grab a jet, helicopter or tank. I just can't compare it to any other game including COD games and/or dlc.