
SummarySoviet Union, 1937. Thousands of letters from detainees falsely accused by the regime are burned in a prison cell. Against all odds, one of them reaches its destination, upon the desk of the newly appointed local prosecutor, Alexander Kornev. Kornev does his utmost to meet the prisoner, a victim of corrupt agents of the secret police, the NKVD. A... Read More
Directed By:Sergey Loznitsa
Written By:Georgy Demidov, Sergey Loznitsa
Two Prosecutors
Metascore
Universal Acclaim
85
User score
Generally Favorable
6.7
My Score
Drag or tap to give a rating
Hover and click to give a rating
Where to Watch
Not available in your country?
ExpressVPN
Get 3 Extra months free
$6.67/mth
Top Cast


Metascore
Universal Acclaim
85
88% Positive
21 Reviews
21 Reviews
13% Mixed
3 Reviews
3 Reviews
0% Negative
0 Reviews
0 Reviews
Mar 25, 2026
100
Historical hindsight lets us predict where this kind of train ride inevitably ends.
Mar 25, 2026
90
What distinguishes Two Prosecutors is not its overall narrative trajectory (which reads more like a bitter cosmic joke than anything else) but rather how Loznitsa subtly colors in Kornyev’s journey through the halls of power.
May 20, 2025
90
This story of civic injustice isn’t just a great achievement by the director. It’s a cautionary tale about the repetition of tragic moments in history.
Sep 23, 2025
85
Two Prosecutors does not offer the audience easy answers or an emotional release; this restraint is exactly what gives it power. It’s a heavy film, one that is important and deserves to be seen.
Mar 25, 2026
80
It would be a mistake to seek too many lessons from the film. Its great achievement is in the creation of a timeless nowhere that is both drawn from history and independent of it. That is the absurdist ideal.
May 20, 2025
75
Loznitsa and his creative team have been meticulous in how every shot plays out. And as hinted earlier, the entire motion picture is meticulous to a fault. It’s only a somewhat twisty ending that saves the endeavor from blowing its relevance away.
May 20, 2025
40
His legal ambitions are thus stymied at every turn by missed appointments and disinterested power players, resulting in glacial narrative pacing and a miserably predictable outcome. It is, at best, vaguely Kafka-esque but also, for the viewer, quite the trial.
User score
Generally Favorable
6.7
69% Positive
11 Ratings
11 Ratings
19% Mixed
3 Ratings
3 Ratings
13% Negative
2 Ratings
2 Ratings
Jul 2, 2026
7
The Great Terror in the Soviet Union in the late 1930s under Stalin, also known as the purge of enemies of the people, was intended to prevent counter-revolutions. This meant that any suspicion of alleged actions against the communist dictatorship resulted in state repression. People vanished from the face of the earth, sent to the Gulag – a camp, a camp full of torment. A life in filth in the deepest, darkest labyrinth of the prison. The People’s Commissariat for Internal Affairs, or NKVD for short, was largely responsible for these arrests at the time. They were known to be uncompromising, devious and unscrupulous. The NKVD considered any means justified in order to send as many enemies of the people as possible to the **** film’s story begins right here in this dark place, which few people apart from the authorities and the inmates have ever seen from the depths within. The camera impressively reveals the labyrinthine prison to the audience. The appalling conditions. The people are effectively dead, even though they are not yet truly dead. A young public prosecutor appears on the scene. He wants to intervene in the system. He has a message with him – from a prisoner. Stepaniak, whom he knew from university, has written a message in his own blood – a cry for justice, a desperate plea for help. Kornev is committed to delivering justice and sees the conditions in which the prisoner lives. His wounds bear witness to brutal torment, his body covered in life-threatening bruises. Mentally broken, Stepniak seeks justice for himself. To what extent can the young public prosecutor help him? Is he aware of the immense risk he is taking? He will not be able to stop the NKVD and Stalin’s dictatorship. At the same time, in his quest for justice, he runs the risk of becoming an enemy of the people himself. He then sets off on a long journey to see the chief of police. In the end, he seems to have convinced him that he needs his help. Yet the film ends with the danger that has loomed over him from the very beginning: Kornev’s arrest. Kornev was duped by the very regime he had intended to protect. He merely sought justice, yet it ended in his punishment.With *The Two Prosecutors*, Ukrainian director Sergei Loznitsa has created a film that uses a specific event to expose the atrocities of the Russian dictatorship. Through this event alone, and the almost astonishingly authentic setting of the Soviet era, the film has a deeply unsettling effect on the audience. The opening sequence and the conversation between Kornev and Stepniak are masterfully conceived. However, the film loses some of its tension after this sequence. The cinematography fails to build on the opening sequence and relies too heavily on close-ups during conversations, which allows the atmosphere to fizzle out.
Production Company:
- SBS Productions
- LOOKSfilm
- Atoms & Void
- White Picture
- Avanpost
- Studio Uljana Kim
- The Match Factory
- Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg (RBB)
- ARTE
- Centre national du cinéma et de l'image animée (CNC)
- L'Aide aux cinémas du monde
- Institut français
- The Netherlands Film Fund
- Mitteldeutsche Medienförderung (MDM)
- Medienboard Berlin-Brandenburg
- Filmförderungsanstalt (FFA)
- Romanian Film Centre
- Riga Film Fund
- Investment and Development Agency of Latvia
- Lithuanian Film Centre
Release Date:Mar 20, 2026
Duration:1 h 57 m
Awards
Lithuanian Film Awards
• 3 Nominations
Valladolid International Film Festival
• 1 Win & 2 Nominations
Cannes Film Festival
• 1 Nomination




























